On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 18:16:28 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> SecureRandom uses straightforward implementations inherited from Random but 
>> in the process does double the memory allocations necessary.
>> The delegation to SecureRandom.engineNextBytes does not provide `int` or 
>> `long` values, the caller must allocate a byte array and assemble the value 
>> itself.
>> So added an implementation in SecureRandom that call nextBytes(8 bytes) and 
>> then convert that to a long.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/SecureRandom.java line 859:
> 
>> 857:         byte[] b = new byte[8];
>> 858:         nextBytes(b); // Calls engineNextBytes internally
>> 859:         return ((long)(b[0] & 0xff) << 56) |
> 
> You can use `ByteArray.getLong(b, 0)` instead. And I don't think we need to 
> rewrite the API specification.

As per our discussion, I have made the changes.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26005#discussion_r2170263918

Reply via email to