On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:58:21 GMT, Ferenc Rakoczi <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Also, a comment will be nice here. Otherwise, some people might still want 
>> to move it.
>
> I have considered the instance variable as well.  It might help the 
> performance of the case you mention (many small squeezes), but I don't think 
> that would be a typical use case. I am adding the comment.

ML-KEM only squeezes 3 bytes each time, but you probably already optimized that 
by storing enough bytes for later uses.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20631#discussion_r1731444434

Reply via email to