On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:58:21 GMT, Ferenc Rakoczi <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Also, a comment will be nice here. Otherwise, some people might still want >> to move it. > > I have considered the instance variable as well. It might help the > performance of the case you mention (many small squeezes), but I don't think > that would be a typical use case. I am adding the comment. ML-KEM only squeezes 3 bytes each time, but you probably already optimized that by storing enough bytes for later uses. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20631#discussion_r1731444434