On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 06:53:25 GMT, Andrey Turbanov <aturba...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi
>> 
>> This change is to improve TLS 1.3 session resumption by allowing a TLS 
>> server to send more than one resumption ticket per connection and clients to 
>> store more.  Resumption is a quick way to use an existing TLS session to 
>> establish another session by avoiding the long TLS full handshake process.  
>> In TLS 1.2 and below, clients can repeatedly resume a session by using the 
>> session ID from an established connection.  In TLS 1.3, a one-time 
>> "resumption ticket" is sent by the server after the TLS connection has been 
>> established.  The server may send multiple resumption tickets to help 
>> clients that rapidly resume connections.  If the client does not have 
>> another resumption ticket, it must go through the full TLS handshake again.  
>> The current implementation in JDK 23 and below, only sends and store one 
>> resumption ticket.
>> 
>> The number of resumption tickets a server can send should be configurable by 
>> the application developer or administrator. [RFC 
>> 8446](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8446) does not specify a default 
>> value.  A system property called `jdk.tls.server.newSessionTicketCount` 
>> allows the user to change the number of resumption tickets sent by the 
>> server.  If this property is not set or given an invalid value, the default 
>> value of 3 is used. Further details are in the CSR.
>> 
>> A large portion of the changeset is on the client side by changing the 
>> caching system used by TLS.  It creates a new `CacheEntry<>` type called 
>> `QueueCacheEntry<>` that will store multiple values for a Map entry.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl.java line 75:
> 
>> 73:  * @author David Brownell
>> 74:  */
>> 75: final public class SSLSessionImpl extends ExtendedSSLSession {
> 
> Use blessed modifiers order
> Suggestion:
> 
> public final class SSLSessionImpl extends ExtendedSSLSession {

Actually being public wasn't necessary anymore.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19465#discussion_r1645296064

Reply via email to