On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:51:33 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> What causes regression in P256 "(~-8-14%)"?
>> From what I see, you re-arranged code to not execute some code
>> ("reducePositive()") when it is not needed. How this affects P256?
>
>> What causes regression in P256 "(~-8-14%)"? From what I see, you re-arranged
>> code to not execute some code ("reducePositive()") when it is not needed.
>> How this affects P256?
>
> Actually, the other way around; reducePositive is now an unconditionally
> executed for both pure java and the intrinsic paths. Perhaps that's what is
> misleading, it was only the mult() intrinsic that was taking advantage of
> this 'skip reduction' before. (pure java did not benefit from removing
> reduction, so I kept it. Now 'keeping it' for both paths)
Hi @vpaprotsk,
@ferakocz is going to take a look at the change. When he says it's ok, I'll
approve the PR.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19728#issuecomment-2174249460
