On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 19:19:03 GMT, Sean Mullan <mul...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Took another pass at this, looks good, but I would like to take another last
> look and make sure that changing the hash code for some of the classes like
> X509CRL is a benign change.
Thanks, Sean. Take your time, you're an expert in this area. Meanwhile, I'll
reflow other similar `{@return ... }` constructs that I missed before, for
readability.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14738#issuecomment-1625945671
