On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 17:43:52 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan <xue...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi,
>> 
>> May I have the code clean up reviewed?
>>  
>> There is a lot of computation in AESCrypt class load, which could be avoid 
>> by using the computation result directly. The computation takes 6.971875 
>> milliseconds in a MacOS M1 laptop. Although it is a one-time computation, 
>> but removing the computation could speed up java/jvm loading time by 
>> 6.971875 milliseconds without extra memory cost. 
>> 
>> Actually, because the computation result are used directly, the methods that 
>> supports the computation are no longer needed and the related static arrays 
>> are no longer needed.  This is the extra benefits to use the computation 
>> result directly, rather than computing on class initialization.
>> 
>> This patch does not change the logic except removing the pre-computation 
>> code and initializing the tables with the pre-computed result explicitly.  
>> The existing regression and inter-op tests should be sufficient to ensure 
>> that the tables are correctly copied from the dumping of the old computation 
>> code results.
>> 
>> Except that, I also cleaned up some code warnings from the IDE I used.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Xuelei
>
> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   add back final keyword and comments about where the tables are from

Look good. Thanks for the patch~

-------------

Marked as reviewed by valeriep (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10568

Reply via email to