On 20.04.10 07:52, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 12:27 +0700, "C. Bergström" wrote:
Ken Gunderson wrote:
Greetings All:
Granted there has been much fear, uncertainty, and doubt following
Oracle's take over of Sun, but I ran across this on a FreeBSD mailing
list post dated 4/20/20
On 28.04.10 14:06, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey
Look up the inode number of README. (for example, ls -i README)
(suppose it’s inode 12345)
find /tank/.zfs/snapshot
On 10.05.10 08:57, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Hi all
It seems that if using zfs, the usual tools like vmstat, sar, top etc are quite
worthless, since zfs i/o load is not reported as iowait etc. Are there any
plans to rewrite the old performance monitoring tools or the zfs parts to allow
for
On 19.05.10 17:53, John Andrunas wrote:
Not to my knowledge, how would I go about getting one? (CC'ing discuss)
man savecore and dumpadm.
Michael
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Mark J Musante wrote:
Do you have a coredump? Or a stack trace of the panic?
On Wed, 19 May 2010, John And
On 27.07.10 14:21, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of devsk
I have many core files stuck in snapshots eating up gigs of my disk
space. Most of these are BE's which I don't really want to delete right
now.
On 08/12/10 04:16, Steve Gonczi wrote:
Greetings,
I am seeing some unexplained performance drop using the above cpus,
using a fairly up-to-date build ( late 145).
Basically, the system seems to be 98% idle, spending most if its time in this
stack:
unix`i86_mwait+0xd
uld be the first step for you.
HTH
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 01.10.09 08:25, camps support wrote:
I did zpool import -R /tmp/z rootpool
It only mounted /export and /rootpool only had /boot and /platform.
I need to be able to get /etc and /var?
zfs set mountpoint ...
zfs mount
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n
, but check the man-page).
"echo * | wc" is also a way to find out what's in a directory, but you'll
miss "."files, and the shell you're using may have an influence ..
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see &#x
). How's
that possible ?
just a few thoughts:
- how do you measure how much space your data consumes?
- how do you copy?
- is the other FS also ZFS?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
Stathis Kamperis wrote:
2009/10/23 michael schuster :
Stathis Kamperis wrote:
Salute.
I have a filesystem where I store various source repositories (cvs +
git). I have compression enabled on and zfs get compressratio reports
1.46x. When I copy all the stuff to another filesystem without
is this about a different FS
*on top of* zpools/zvols? If so, I'll have to defer to Team ZFS.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
} && zfs get used rpool/export/home && cp /testfile
/export/home/d${i}; done
as far as I understood it, the dedup works during writing, and won't
deduplicate already written data (this is planned for a later release).
isn't he doing just that (writing, that
have been compressed using compress. It
is the equivalent of uncompress-c. Input files are not
affected.
:-)
cheers
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-dis
all it 'ln' ;-) and that even works on ufs.
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ntics of ZFS.
I actually was thinking of creating a hard link (without the -s option),
but your point is valid for hard and soft links.
cheers
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
files to end up in one file; the
traditional concat operation will cause all the data to be read and written
back, at which point dedup will kick in, and so most of the processing has
already been spent. (Per, please correct/comment)
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recur
, there is no "original" and "copy"; rather, every directory
entry points to "the data" (the inode, in ufs-speak), and if one directory
entry of several is deleted, only the reference count changes.
It's probably a little more complicated with dedup, but I think
ptionally slow partially
because it will sort the output.
that's what '-f' was supposed to avoid, I'd guess.
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
e is the directory pointer is shuffled around. This is not the
case with ZFS data sets, even though they're on the same pool?
no - mv doesn't know about zpools, only about posix filesystems.
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion&
.
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
orted".
what is that supposed to mean?
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
support Java and OpenSolaris User Groups, as Sun has?
...
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/li
ol ;-)
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> Cheers,
> B.
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
--
Michael Schuster
http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
e that the name came after the TLA.
> "zfs" came first and "zettabyte" later.
as Jeff told it (IIRC), the "expanded" version of zfs underwent
several changes during the development phase, until it was decided one
day to attach none of them to "zfs" and just
2x 3TB Hitachi HUS723030ALS640, SAS, 7.2K
>
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
>
--
Michael Schuster
http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/
t;>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> -- Peter
>>>
>>> Supermicro X9DRH-iF
>>> Xeon E5-2620 @ 2.0 GHz 6-Core
>>> LSI SAS9211-8i HBA
>>> 32x 3TB Hitachi HUS723030ALS640, SAS, 7.2K
>>>
>>> ___
>>> zfs-discuss mailing
On 17.08.10 04:17, Will Murnane wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 21:58, Kishore Kumar Pusukuri
wrote:
Hi,
I am surprised with the performances of some 64-bit multi-threaded
applications on my AMD Opteron machine. For most of the applications, the
performance of 32-bit version is almost same as t
On 30.09.10 15:42, Mark J Musante wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Linder, Doug wrote:
Is there any technical difference between using "zfs unmount" to unmount
a ZFS filesystem versus the standard unix "umount" command? I always use
"zfs unmount" but some of my colleagues still just use umount. Is t
H
--
regards/mit freundlichen Grüssen
Michael Schuster
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
had no insight into any of
these plans, much less do I have now.
--
regards/mit freundlichen Grüssen
Michael Schuster
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
und the time you saw the loss of connectivity, and also
since, then take it from there.
HTH
Michael
--
regards/mit freundlichen Grüssen
Michael Schuster
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ppens between two writes (even from a single user), it will
be consistent from the POV of the FS, but may not be from the POV of the
application.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/
___
zfs-discuss mailing li
ething like parted to shrink the NTFS partition
2) create a new partition without FS in the space now freed from NTFS
3) boot OpenSolaris, add the partition from 2) as vdev to your zpool.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/
__
nge your "receive" command to
'/sbin/zfs receive ...'
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
rading to a zfs which supports 'zfs allow' my only
> option?
I would suspect as much, though I'll defer to the ZFS experts to give you a
definite answer.
Is 'zpool upgrade' / 'zfs upgrade' difficult for you?
Michael
--
Michael Schusterh
s there are compatitors out there ;-)
I don't see any contradiction here - even if ZFS is the way to go, there's
no objecting to other people trying their own path, right? ;-)
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
__
good option too. I still would
> have wanted to set the mount point to either legacy or none since
> a real mountpoint would have been meaningless and would
> have still been inheritable.
I personally find 'legacy' a little misleading, and - if possible - would
suggest cha
ures to make sure you get one that works on your machine(s) and that
you also get the patch once it's available.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mai
e you can save yourself the
hassle of going through the vmware + windows combo.
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
htt
"
>
> Any comments and ideas how to "really" remove the zvols and what's the
> issue with slow zpool import ?
maybe "zpool status" and "fmdump" can shed some light ...
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recurs
-a |grep
> nfs
> disabled 18:04:58 svc:/network/nfs/server:default
so what happens when you do "svcadm enable svc:/network/nfs/server:default"?
what's the output of "svcs -x svc:/network/nfs/server:default", and what do
the
gt; cannot share 'export/home': /export/home: Unknown error
>>
>> I am not able to start nfs server also.
>>
>> ech3-mes01.prod:schadala[512] ~ $ svcs -a |grep
>> nfs
>
>
>> disable
t; rpool/ROOT anymore. It should be mounted on (legacy) .alt.tmp.b-yh.mnt/
>
> Is this problem solvable? I -do- hope so!
>
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailin
ce when does "support" equate to "patches" (only)? There's much more to
support than just supplying (or even creating!) patches.
(oh, btw: wasn't IPS created in part to get away from the whole patch ...
ermm ... issue? ;-)
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://bl
;t free as long as there's a snapshot referencing it.
> Would the snapshot be overwritten or the system would warn there is no
> free space?
I'd expect you'd get "no free space" or something like that.
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
me".
I don't want to "zfs destroy" tank/schuster/ilb before I've had a chance to
check what's inside ...
this is snv_89, btw. zfs and zpool are at current revisions (3 and 10, resp.).
does anyone have any hints what I could do to solve this?
TIA
M
Mark J Musante wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Did you try doing an export/import of tank?
no - that would make it unavailable for use right? I don't think I can
(easily) do that during production hours.
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
R
Johan Hartzenberg wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Michael Schuster
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Mark J Musante wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Did you try doing an e
use rsync from the
old filesystems to the new filesystems, but it seems like there should
be a way to mirror or replicate the pool itself rather than doing it at
the filesystem level.
have you looked at what 'zfs send' can do?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/rec
m type. It's easy to spot the zfs with the lack
of recognisable device path, though.
which df are you using?
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing li
t already tells me that the label doesn't align with the disk size ...
should I just do "expand", or should I change the first sectore of
partition 0 to be 0?
I'd appreciate advice on the above, and on how to avoid this in the future.
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.
michael schuster wrote:
All,
this morning, I did "pkg image-update" from 118 to 123 (internal repo),
and upon reboot all I got was the grub prompt - no menu, nothing.
I found a 2009.06 CD, and when I boot that and run "zpool import", I
get told
localtank UNAVAIL i
laris-119
5) pkg rename opensolaris-119 opensolaris-123 # this failed, because it's
active
6) pkg activate opensolaris-118 # so I can rename the new one
7) pkg rename ...
8) pkg activate opensolaris-123
9) reboot
thx
Michael
Cindy
On 09/18/09 11:05, michael schuster wrote:
michael sc
t point, you might search the indiana-discuss
archive for tips on
resolving the pkg-image-update no grub menu problem.
if I don't see rpool, that's not going to be the next step for me, right?
thx
Michael
Cindy
On 09/18/09 12:08, michael schuster wrote:
Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Mi
not anymore - I realised I had no relevant data on the box, so I
re-installed to get going again.
thx
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensol
le,
Jan 23 18:51:38 newponit so panic to ensure data integrity.
this message shows (and the rest of the stack prove) that your panic
happened in SVM. It has NOTHING to do with zfs. So either you pulled the
wrong disk, or the disk you pulled also contained SVM volumes (next to ZFS).
--
Michae
Ihsan Dogan wrote:
I think you hit a major bug in ZFS personally.
For me it also looks like a bug.
I think we don't have enough information to judge. If you have a supported
version of Solaris, open a case and supply all the data (crash dump!) you have.
HTH
--
Michael Sch
wever. This is OpenSolaris.
no, I'm not. That's why I said "If you have a supported version of
Solaris". Also, Ihsan seems to disagree about OpenSolaris:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # uname -a
SunOS newponit 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60
Michael
--
Michael Sc
these days? putting
/tmp on disk can have quite severe impact on performance.
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Erblichs wrote:
Whose job is it to "clean" or declare for removal kernel
sources that "do not work"?
not the people on *this* list, IMO.
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
__
disks, there shouldn't be an issue here.
If you expand a bit on this, I'm sure our zfs experts can give you a
more precise answer than this :-)
HTH
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
fer this feature.
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zf
John Martinez wrote:
On Jun 14, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Michael Schuster wrote:
People,
indeed, even though interesting and a problem, this is OT. I suggest
that everyone who has trouble with SDM address it to the people who
actually work on it - especially if you're a (potential) cus
replying to myself ...
Michael Schuster wrote:
look at http://www.sun.com/download/sdm/index.xml, and would suggest you
use the 'contact' link (bottom left). I realise it's probably very
un-SDM-specific ...
HTH
http://www.sun.com/download/sdm/sdm_help.xml has a feedback fo
k in a ZFS pool under Solaris 10.
How can I now mount/incorporate/import this Disk #2 into a ZFS pool on my new
Solaris so that I can see the data stored on that disk?
zpool import
HTH
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-
.
If so, is there a tool that can help with such recovery?
I can't answer this in detail, but, to borrow from Tim O'Reilly, think
of it as the text of a book where you've lost the table of contents and
the first few chapters, and thrown all the remaining pages on the floor..
root root 3 Jun 23 10:19 dirs
# ls -als /extra/some/more/dirs/
total 9
3 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 3 Jun 23 10:19 .
3 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 3 Jun 23 10:19 ..
3 drwxr-xr-x 5 root sys8 May 15 21:54 store
#
HTH
michael
--
Michael Sch
th/to/storage.copy; since zfs created this directory in the first place,
is it an unreasonable expectation that zfs remove it as well?
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-d
25 0 87.2K
--- - - - - - -
I find it remarkable that what is c1* in iostat obviously turns into c3*
in zpool iostat.
comments?
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n: see 'recursion'
__
> #
make sure you have no unprintable characters in the file name (eg. with a
command like
ls -las | od -c
or some such)
HTH
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
::creat64:return
/self->spec/
{
discard(self->spec);
self->spec = 0;
}
you may need to use a different timestamp (walltimestamp?); and perhaps
you'll want to somehow reduce the number of fbt probes, but that's up to
you. I hope yo
with different
predicates fire in the order encountered in the script.
is there a reason you took dtrace-discuss off the distribution list?
cheers
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss m
to try that scenario.
you might get lucky once (note: I said "might"), but there's no
guarantee, and sooner or later this approach *will* cause data corruption.
wouldn't it be much simpler to use NFS & automounter for this scenario
(I didn't follow the whole th
it wasn't documented with the
whole
qfs wad you get when you acquire (read: buy) the stuff.
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
xfs system.
just asking the obvious:
- is this the same HW?
- are zfs/zpool and xfs set up similarly?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Can't we print something only if it goes wrong?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Mark J Musante wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Michael Schuster wrote:
>
>> I recently started seeing zfs chattiness at boot time: "reading zfs config"
>> and something like "mounting zfs filesystems (n/n)".
>
> This was added recently because Z
Gary Mills wrote:
> What's the command to show cross calls?
mpstat
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n: see 'recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.or
Mike DeMarco wrote:
> Looking for a way to mount a zfs filesystem ontop of another zfs
> filesystem without resorting to legacy mode.
doesn't simply 'zfs set mountpoint=...' work for you?
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
point inside another zfs filesystem.
I may be a missing the obvious here: what are you trying to solve that
Eric's explanation didn't cover?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mail
ving to
> unload/rebuild the remaining data in the orbits/myear filesystem?
as far as I can tell, you're asking for/about remove functionality in zfs
(please correct). The last I heard, this was in the works. Search the
archives on opensolaris.org etc. to find references to the bug ID and
g to the
difficulties by his comments.
(and remember: email is not the same as "yelling at one another" (in the
hallway/at the conference table))
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n: see 'recursion'
___
an older build? if no, are there
errors in the messages file? ...
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ing 35GB, and about 1GB is missing.
>
> cp gives me no errors, and zpool status says everything is fine.
>
> A du -k of both trees shows the discrepancy.
are you missing disk space, or actual files?
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n: see &#
| (cd /pond/copytestsame; tar xf -)
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n: see 'recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
to ask whether any
files/directories in /pond/photos/ start with a "."; beneath there, that
should be irrelevant.
Michael
--
Michael SchusterSun Microsystems, Inc.
recursion, n: see 'recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
then I tried..
>
> #/usr/sbin/netservices open
>
> Still not working..
>
> I am running snv_82, a fresh install: is there anything else that I
> should enable/disable ?
are you sure the service is actually running? does "svcs -a | grep
webconsole" say "onli
iles are extracted from
the tarfile and written to the directory specified in
the tarfile, relative to the current directory.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
__
ving to restore the whole archive. I'm looking
>> for a tool that can do that.
>
> Why do you believe that an incremental backup disallows to extract single
> files
Rich never said so. He said "the ability to do incremental backups and
restore arbitrary files fro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> (Again, I disliked the "file;X"
> notation and the fact that a manual purge was required).
You could set the number of revisions to keep; VMS would delete older ones.
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion,
ctory/1: name too long.
> cp: 0653-438 cannot read directory directory/1.
> and the cp core dumps in AIX.
I think someone from the AIX camp is probably better suited to answering
this, as they hopefully understand under which circumstances AIX's cp
would spit out this kind of err
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
n
Solaris *does* start to swap (ie page out pages by process). IIRC, the
threshold for swapping is minfree (measured in pages), and the value that
needs to fall below this threshold is freemem.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion&#
to build 89 yet, but you can
certainly get some practice so that wen you get b89, you know what to do.
(and no, eschrock is not a pseudonym of mine ;-)
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
__
Hans wrote:
> hello,
> can i create a image from ZFS with the DD command?
You're probably looking for "zfs send" - have a go at the man-page and see
whether that serves the purpose.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursio
Brian Nelson wrote:
> Although not OpenSolaris, I had a raidz pool on a SCSI A1000 using Solaris 10
> just disappear. zpool
> import says no pool exists.
have you checked the state / health of the A1000?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion
e devices
[...]
$ zfs upgrade -v
The following filesystem versions are supported:
VER DESCRIPTION
---
1 Initial ZFS filesystem version
2 Enhanced directory entries
3 Case insensitive and File system unique identifer (FUID)
[...]
t; seem uninterruptible.
I saw this once before and rebooted, thereafter "zpool status" showed nothing.
so: how do I find out more about what's going on and what's broken, and how
do I fix it without just deleting the FS?
thx
Michael
--
Michael Schusterhttp://blogs.
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
