Re: [zfs-discuss] GSoC 09 zfs ideas?

2009-02-28 Thread Thomas Wagner
> >> pool-shrinking (and an option to shrink disk A when i want disk B to > >> become a mirror, but A is a few blocks bigger) > This may be interesting... I'm not sure how often you need to shrink a pool > though? Could this be classified more as a Home or SME level feature? Enterprise level e

Re: [zfs-discuss] GSoC 09 zfs ideas?

2009-02-28 Thread Thomas Wagner
what different than destroying a filesytem or > entire pool. At least to my mind. > > As such, consider it a piece of mind feature. > -- > bda > Cyberpunk is dead. Long live cyberpunk. > http://mirrorshades.org > _______ > zfs-dis

[zfs-discuss] state of zfs pool shrinking

2009-05-14 Thread Thomas Wagner
Just wanted to ask how we make progress with zpool shrinking? Are there any prerequisite projects we are waiting on? e.g. tracked by CR 4852783 reduce pool capacity Thomas -- ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.openso

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS raid is very slow???

2007-07-17 Thread Thomas Wagner
> zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Thomas Wagner -- ***** Thomas WagnerTel:+49-(0)-711-720 98

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best option for my home file server?

2007-09-28 Thread Thomas Wagner
sliceing say "S0" to be used as root-filesystem would make ZFS not using the write-buffer on the disks. This would be a slight performance degrade, but would increate reliability of the system (since root is mirrored). Why not living on the edge and booting from ZFS ? This would nearly eliminate U

Re: [zfs-discuss] ?: ZFS and jumpstart export race condition

2006-09-08 Thread Thomas Wagner
efault > > ___________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Thomas Wagner -- ***

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS imported simultanously on 2 systems...

2006-09-13 Thread Thomas Wagner
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:28:23PM +0200, Michael Schuster wrote: > Mathias F wrote: > >Well, we are using the -f parameter to test failover functionality. > >If one system with mounted ZFS is down, we have to use the force to mount > >it on the failover system. > >But when the failed system com

Re: [zfs-discuss] mkdir == zfs create

2006-09-28 Thread Thomas Wagner
> > (And if you don't need it to work remotely automount could take care of it > > if you think "cd" should be sufficient reason to create a directory) > > Maybe on unmount empty filesystems could be destroyed. more general? If we have "events" like a library-call to "mkdir" or "change-dir" o