Re: [zfs-discuss] [osol-discuss] zfs data loss after crash

2009-09-03 Thread Shawn Walker
and I just noticed that the data is way out of date. Most of the files look like I have lost 2 weeks worth of data. So, my questions are: 1) Is this expected? 2) Is there anyway to get my recent data back? Someone on zfs-discuss is likely to be able to help you better. Cheers, -- Shawn W

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re: How much do we really want zpool remove?

2007-02-27 Thread Shawn Walker
- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and Kstats

2007-03-27 Thread Shawn Walker
On 27/03/07, Atul Vidwansa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter, How do I get those stats programatically? Any clues? Regards, _Atul man kstat http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5172/6mbb7bu50?q=kstats&a=view -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd

Re: Re[12]: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Boot support for the x86 platform

2007-03-28 Thread Shawn Walker
ther option is the Default layout, with puts all the space into /export/home Malachi This must be specific to your system somehow. On my x86 box, I have a 16GB / partition... -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Syst

Re: Re[12]: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Boot support for the x86 platform

2007-03-28 Thread Shawn Walker
On 28/03/07, Malachi de Ælfweald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is that on slice 0? Mine is trying to do it on c1d0s0 Yes, c2d0s0 in my case. -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL P

Re: [zfs-discuss] File level snapshots in ZFS?

2007-03-29 Thread Shawn Walker
where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] File level snapshots in ZFS?

2007-03-29 Thread Shawn Walker
On 29/03/07, Wee Yeh Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/30/07, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 29/03/07, Atul Vidwansa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > I am not talking about source(ASCII) files. How about versioning > > pro

Re: [zfs-discuss] File level snapshots in ZFS?

2007-03-29 Thread Shawn Walker
On 29/03/07, Wee Yeh Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/30/07, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, recent version control systems can be very efficient at > storing binary files. Still no where as efficient as a ZFS snapshot. Maybe, but they're far bet

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: opensolaris, zfs rootfs raidz

2007-04-05 Thread Shawn Walker
any easy way to just get the latest solaris kernel via web? Know that efforts were in place a long time ago to streamline the upgrade and update processes. Ian did not join Sun (as far as I know) to make any change to Solaris directly or its processes. Any success in this area should be attributed t

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.

2007-04-05 Thread Shawn Walker
Pawel, and quite impressive. I know I can safely speak for others when I say that the work you've done and your participation in the community is much appreciated! -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analys

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and Linux

2007-04-11 Thread Shawn Walker
nefit. It seems Sun is internally divided on the GPL. Your CEO and Java division seem quite happy with it. Just like any community, there are differences in opinion. Communities are made of individuals. -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and Linux

2007-04-12 Thread Shawn Walker
On 12/04/07, Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12-Apr-07, at 1:02 AM, Shawn Walker wrote: > ... > > Which is funny considering how many GPL projects *love* the fact that > BSD-licensed code is easily integrable with their project, yet don't > want to gi

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and Linux

2007-04-12 Thread Shawn Walker
; of the > GPL, Is it worth reading the rest of your post, if it starts with silliness like that? The truth is never silly. -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogsp

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs send/receive question

2007-04-16 Thread Shawn Walker
On 16/04/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ah, ok, not a problem, do you know Cindy when next Solaris Update is going to be released by SUN? Yes, I am running U3 at this moment. Summer is what I last read (July?). -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Llo

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Shawn Walker
within a small box versus taking up the full wall. This is already being done now, and most of the companies doing it are being sued like crazy :) -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL P

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS for Linux (NO LISCENCE talk, please)

2007-04-18 Thread Shawn Walker
70 In short, code that was written without any _Linux_ origin can probably be ported and distributed without issue in his view though a Judge could decide otherwise and some kernel developers feel otherwise. -- "Less is only more where more is no

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re: zfs boot image conversion kit is posted

2007-04-20 Thread Shawn Walker
where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS on 32bit x86

2006-06-24 Thread Shawn Walker
> Erik Trimble wrote: > This is an @opensolaris.org alias it is about working > together as a > community and identifying problems and discovering > solutions. I don't > think it is at all appropriate to bring up Sun > business choices here. > Where that is appropriate is when Sun employees nee

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Extended metadata?

2006-06-24 Thread Shawn Walker
> > Well, I think that's the first time that I've been > > accused of being "detail lite [sic]"... Indeed, > it's > > amazing to me that anyone could read > > all of the content that I pointed to and not be > > _overwhelmed_ with detail. > > Really? Perhaps we are looking for different things. >

[zfs-discuss] Re: user quotas vs filesystem quotas?

2006-08-15 Thread Shawn Walker
> The other filesystem is /var/mail on my mail server. > I've traditionally > un (big) user quotas in mailboxes just to keep some > malicious > emailer from filling up /var/mail, maybe. The > notion of having > one zfs filesystem per mailbox seems unwieldy, just > to run quotas > per user. It s