Hi,
It's a different version in terms of the Unix standard it complies to:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5221/6mbcm38u8?l=en&a=view
On 12/16/07, KASTURI VENKATA SESHA SASIDHAR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I am working on open solaris bugs .. and need to change the code
Perhaps a few that might help:
http://www.sun.com/software/whitepapers/solaris10/zfs_veritas.pdf
http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/stn/articles/article_detail.jsp?articleid=SF_and_ZFS_whitepaper_44545
http://www.serverwatch.com/tutorials/article.php/3663066
I'm yet to see a side by side features
While on a VCS course on a Symantec site, I was told VxVM is planned
to be open sourced some time in near future. In either case the cost
is a large factor here, VxVM does not come cheap (unless you use VxSF
Basic http://www.symantec.com/business/theme.jsp?themeid=sfbasic which
is free).
I see Vx
I believe it will work on systems wich have more than 2 cores, however
only 2 would actually end up being used by VxSF & 4 volumes is not a
hard software limit from what I understand.
It's important to note it will not come with any support, perhaps this
is another point where ZFS rises above in t
On 12/29/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One good feature in VxVM/VxFS is an ability to shrink a "pool" or
> change RAID on-the-fly. Then you can change speed of resilvering or
> even freeze it if you want. Hot spare support is probably still better
> (I haven't looked at latest i
Hi,
Not sure if it's the case here. However I've seen "Value too
large for defined data type" errors on systems which had date (year)
set incorrectly.
On 1/7/08, Arne Schwabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange problem with a zfs filesystem.
>
> zfs scrub stuff reports no error
Veritas products tend to work best with... well... other Veritas products.
On 1/11/08, Patrick Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello experts,
>
>
> We have a large implementation of Symantec Netbackup 6.0 with disk staging.
> Today, the customer is using VxFS as file system inside Netbackup
On 1/17/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pardon my ignorance, but is ZFS with compression safe to use in a
> > production environment?
>
> Yes, why wouldn't it be ? If it wasn't safe it wouldn't have been
> delivered.
Few reasons -
http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/11/28/
On 1/19/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On what do you base that statement ?
>
> How do you "see" what enterprises are adopting ?
>
> State your sources please.
Out of the many I work on only one's been keen on adopting it any time
soon, another one's planning to look into it but
On 1/18/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simply FUD.
I don't see many enterprises adopting ZFS even though it's been
officially out for a while now. Looking over the mailing list and
numbers of ZFS patches, it's enough to scare lots of people away.
Don't get me wrong, I believe ZF
On 1/19/08, Paul Kraus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect that the amount of changes / discussion is no less
> for ZFS than for any new filesystem, just that due to the open source
> nature of it the discussions are in public view. The fact that the
> issues *are* being discussed is a h
On 1/19/08, Fred Zlotnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, of course, many other enterprise customers _have_ adopted
> ZFS, and are quite happy with it. For a list of ZFS reference
> customers please contact Solaris Marketing. ZFS is used in many
> mission critical roles today, and by and large
Hi,
I don't have a ZFS box handy right now, but perhaps Sun Explorer would
generate something about ZFS/zpools which details the overall configs.
Just a thought.
On 3/21/08, Sachin Palav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Friends
>
> Can someone please let me know how I can backup the ZFS confi
Hi all,
A bit confused now... Wasn't Samba an implementation of CIFS which
also runs on Solaris?
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Zlotnick Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > The in-kernel CIFS stack is not in Solaris 10 Upd
14 matches
Mail list logo
