On 1/19/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On what do you base that statement ? > > How do you "see" what enterprises are adopting ? > > State your sources please.
Out of the many I work on only one's been keen on adopting it any time soon, another one's planning to look into it but doesn't see many benefits in it over VxSF (storage foundation). Main struggle for companies is migrating to ZFS from other solutions out there, and still keeping the functionality/processes/standards they need on regular basis (eg. data migrations, BCVs and backup strategies, remote replication, DR, and general uptime of their applications). People should not only see the enterprises which have adopted ZFS, there's plenty of them which haven't done so for various good/bad reasons. Partially due to their scale and complexity/worthiness of deploying something new cross company wide, which might not be necessarely a ZFS specific obstacle. -- _________________________________/ sengork.blogspot.com /¯¯¯¯ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
