Interesting...
http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/RCF/LiaisonMeeting/20070118/Other/thumper-eval.pdf
http://scalability.org/?p=202
Rayson
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
1) Take a look at the "ZFS Source Tour":
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/source/
2) You may also want to talk to the FreeBSD zfs port maintainer:
http://perforce.freebsd.org/depotTreeBrowser.cgi?FSPC=//depot/user/pjd/zfs
3) The source of ZFS is in a few different directories:
Main FS
NT kernel has the filter driver framework:
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/filterdrv/default.mspx
It seems to be useful for things like FS encrytion and compression...
is there any plan to implement something similar in Solaris??
Rayson
___
zfs-d
On 2/26/07, Jim Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Availability Suite product set
(http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/avs/) offers both snapshot and
data replication data services, both of which are built on top of a
Solaris filter driver framework.
Is the Solaris filter driver framework
I read this paper on Sunday. Seems interesting:
The Architecture of PolyServe Matrix Server: Implementing a Symmetric
Cluster File System
http://www.polyserve.com/requestinfo_formq1.php?pdf=2
What interested me the most is that the metadata and lock are spread
across all the nodes. I read the "
So what is the progress of the SATA Framework integration??
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/flag-days/pages/2006011301/
I don't have an X2200-M2, but I would love to run my SATA drives in SATA mode :)
Rayson
On 3/12/07, Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12-Mar-07, at 2:37
A good starting point:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/
Rayson
On 3/13/07, kanishk rastogi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i wanted to know in detail about the zfs.Like its physical disk
structure. If u can point me the links, i did be greatful.
regards
kanishk
__
BTW, did anyone try this??
http://blogs.sun.com/ValdisFilks/entry/improving_i_o_throughput_for
Rayson
On 3/27/07, Wee Yeh Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As promised. I got my 6140 SATA delivered yesterday and I hooked it
up to a T2000 on S10u3. The T2000 saw the disks straight away and is
I like these articles at SDN:
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/kstatc.html
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/kstat_part2.html
Rayson
On 3/27/07, Sanjeev Bagewadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Atul,
libkstat(3LIB) is the library.
"man -s 3KSTAT kstat" should give a good star
On 4/11/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm looking closely to GPLv3 but maybe Linux should change it's
license to actually provide more freedom and problem would disappear
then. See ZFS being ported to FreeBSD.
Agreed.
Why does everyone need to be compatible with Linux?? Why n
On 4/11/07, Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hope this isn't turning into a License flame war. But why do Linux
contributors not deserve the right to retain their choice of license
as equally as Sun, or any other copyright holder, does?
Hey, then just don't *keep on* asking to relicense
On 4/12/07, Chen, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How to dtrace a who is writing a veritas volume?
May be fuser or lsof is faster to provide the answer??
Rayson
Thanks.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opensolaris.
On 4/13/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I definitely prefer CDDL or BSD license - they just offer more freedom.
+1
The Linux community won't be happy unless they get anything and
everything opensourced. And not only opensourced, it has to be under
GPL. And not only under GPL, t
On 4/16/07, Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but there is another article somewhere
about tuning for t2000, related to PCI on the t2000, ie it is
t2000-specific.
This one??
http://blogs.sun.com/ValdisFilks/entry/improving_i_o_throughput_for
Rayson
-frank
__
Adrian, you can take a look at pNFS:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/os_user_groups/frosug/pNFS/FROSUG-pNFS.pdf
Project homepage:
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nfsv41/
Rayson
On 4/16/07, Jason A. Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 16, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Adrian Thompson wrote:
On 4/17/07, David R. Litwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So that it can be used directly with the Linux kernel.
On the flip side, why shouldn't it be?
Do you want to spam *EVERY* open source project asking to change the
license to GPL so that you can use it with Linux??
How about asking Microso
On 4/17/07, David R. Litwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about asking Microsoft to change Shared Source first??
Let's leave ms out of this, eh? :-)
While ZFS is nice, I don't think it is a must for most desktop users.
For servers and power users, yes. But most (over 90% of world
populatio
On 4/17/07, Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Same here. I think anyone who dismisses ZFS as being inappropriate for
desktop use ("who needs access to Petabytes of space in their desktop
machine?!") doesn't get it.
Well, for many of those who find it hard to upgrade Windows, I guess
you wil
On 4/17/07, Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OS X tends to effectively elide the "book larning" part of using
UNIX. I don't think ZFS would be any exception - they won't ship
until "you don't even know it's there".
But then, I have helped people "fixing" their computers by emptying
the rec
Also related to ZFS/X4500:
1) Sun Fire X4500 Data Server for Mainframes, ZFS for mainframe:
http://www.luminex.com/about/press/pr070417.html
2) Written by Jim Gray and his co-workers:
Performance of a Sun X4500 under Windows, NTFS and SQLserver 2005
http://research.microsoft.com/~Gray/papers/JHU
On 4/24/07, Brian Hechinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also keep in mind that FUSE has the disadvantage of data needing to
pass the userland/kernel barrier typically at least twice, so there
will be some slowdown there most likely.
I think it depends on how the Linux kernel handles the interfac
On 4/28/07, Brian Hechinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So what you *really* want is TSM. I wonder if IBM would ever
consider supporting ZFS.
Just wondering, does Sun/STK have something similar to TSM??
Rayson
-brian
--
"Perl can be fast and elegant as much as J2EE can be fast and elegant
On 5/3/07, Frank Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not quite sure what this test should show ?
I didn't try the test myself... but I think what it shows is a
possible problem that turning compression can hang a machine.
Rayson
Compressing random data is the perfect way to generate he
Tried filebench before??
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/FileBench
Rayson
On 5/9/07, cesare VoltZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I used in the past iozone (http://www.iozone.org/) but I'm wondering
if there are other tools.
Thanks.
Cesare
_
http://www.bsdcan.org/2007/schedule/events/43.en.html
Direct link to the presentation:
http://www.bsdcan.org/2007/schedule/attachments/27-Porting_ZFS_file_system_to_FreeBSD_Pawel_Jakub_Dawidek.pdf
And presentation for Asia BSDCon 2007:
http://asiabsdcon.org/papers/P16-slides.pdf
http://asiabsdco
Did you take a look at "Solaris ZFS and Vertias Storage Foundation
File System Performance White Paper"??
It's more than just a presentation, but I guess you can extract the
graphs from the paper:
http://www.sun.com/software/whitepapers/solaris10/zfs_veritas.pdf
Rayson
On 7/13/07, Vishal Dhur
I found a very nice doc. that describes the steps to create a kernel dump:
"The Solaris Operating System on x86 Platforms - Crashdump Analysis
Operating System Internals"
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/documentation/files/book.pdf
-> 7.2.2.Forcing system crashdumps
Rayson
On 7/17/07, Ja
On 7/30/07, Brian Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think that ZFS would lie in the VFS subsystem
VFS is just an interface between a filesystem and the rest of the kernel.
> Could someone point me to a doc/diagram that would help clarify this for
> me?
See Figure 3:
Traditional file sys
1) Modern DBMSs cache database pages in their own buffer pool because
it is less expensive than to access data from the OS. (IIRC, MySQL's
MyISAM is the only one that relies on the FS cache, but a lot of MySQL
sites use INNODB which has its own buffer pool)
2) Also, direct I/O is faster because it
On 10/3/07, Roch - PAE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We do not retain 2 copies of the same data.
>
> If the DB cache is made large enough to consume most of memory,
> the ZFS copy will quickly be evicted to stage other I/Os on
> their way to the DB cache.
>
> What problem does that pose ?
Hi Roch,
On 10/5/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RH> 2) Also, direct I/O is faster because it avoids double buffering.
>
> I doubt its buying you much...
We don't know how much the performance gain is until we get a
prototype and benchmark it - the behavior is different with different
DBM
Restarting this thread... I've just finished reading the article, "A
look at MySQL on ZFS":
http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/articles/mysql-zfs.html
The section " MySQL Performance Comparison: ZFS vs. UFS on Open
Solaris" looks interesting...
Rayson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is very interesting because it directly contradicts the results the ZFS
> developers are posting on the OpenSolaris mailing list. I just scanned the
> article, does he give his ZFS settings and is he separate ZIL devices?
>
> Tony Leo
Does anyone know whether the following (copied from Wikipedia) is true or not??
"Solaris has a project called CIFS client for Solaris, based on the
Mac OS X smbfs."
Rayson
On Nov 4, 2007 9:34 AM, Mark Shellenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Razvan Corneliu VILT wrote:
> > Sounds like the righ
First reported by a Sun blogger (http://blogs.sun.com/simons/), most
of the HPC Consortium meeting in Reno presentations are now onlone:
https://events-at-sun.com/hpcreno/presentations.html
Some people on this list may be interested in this: "Lustre – CFS
Update, Peter Braam, CEO, Cluster File Sys
Have you read the "ZFS On-Disk Specification"??
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/
Or are you trying to find something specific??
Rayson
On Dec 3, 2007 5:31 PM, Michael A Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Can someone point me to a whitepaper, blog, or other document tha
Peter Braam's talk, which has more information related to ZFS/Lustre FS
integration:
https://hpc.sun.com/blog/richbruecknersuncom/video-lustre-file-system-presented-sun-hpc-consortium-reno
"ZFS/DMU benchmarks":
https://mail.clusterfs.com/pipermail/lustre-announce/2007-November/000147.html
Rayson
37 matches
Mail list logo
