Hi folks,
wanted to share some exciting news with you. Pogo Linux shipping
NexentaStor pre-installed boxes, like this one 16TB - 24TB:
http://www.pogolinux.com/quotes/editsys?sys_id=3989
And here is announce:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=129&Itemid=56
P
Hey folks,
just saw another cool news this morning - Nexenta Systems released
documentation for remote API and Windows SDK with demos for accessing
NexentaStor. News itself:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=154&Itemid=56
ZFS and the rest of appliance function
Steffen,
Most complete and serious ZFS snapshot management, integrated ZFS
send/recv replication over RSYNC with CLI, integrated AVS, GUI and
management server which provides rich API for C/C++/Perl/Python/Ruby
integrators available here:
http://www.nexenta.com/nexentastor-overview
Its ZFS+ with
Well, obviously - its Linux vs. OpenSolaris question. Most serious
advantage of OpenSolaris is ZFS and its enterprise level storage stack.
Linux just not there yet..
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:51 +0200, Axel Schmalowsky wrote:
> Hallo list,
>
> hope that so can help me on this topic.
>
> I'd like
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> A disadvantage, however, is that Sun StorageTek Availability Suite
> (AVS), the DRBD equivalent in OpenSolaris, is much less flexible than
> DRBD. For example, AVS is intended to replicate in one direction,
> from a primary to a seconda
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 15:00 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> A disadvantage, however, is that Sun StorageTek Availability Suite
> >> (AVS), the DRBD equivalent in OpenSolaris, is much less flexible than
> >> DRBD. For example, AVS is
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 18:37 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 15:00 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >> A disadvantage, however, is that Sun StorageTek Availability Suite
> >> >> (AVS), the DRBD equivalent i
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 19:10 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 18:37 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 15:00 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >> >> A disadvantage, however, is that
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 19:42 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 19:10 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 18:37 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 15:00 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> >> >> >> >On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -04
James, all serious ZFS bug fixes back-ported to b85 as well as marvell
and other sata drivers. Not everything is possible to back-port of
course, but I would say all critical things are there. This includes ZFS
ARC optimization patches, for example.
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 22:33 +1000, James C. McPh
pNFS is NFS-centric of course and it is not yet stable, isn't it? btw,
what is the ETA for pNFS putback?
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 12:20 -0700, Marion Hakanson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > It's interesting how the speed and optimisation of these maintenance
> > activities limit pool size. It'
Hi Stephen,
NexentaStor v1.1.5+ could be an alternative, I think. And it includes
new cool COMSTAR integration, i.e. ZFS shareiscsi property actually
implements COMSTAR iSCSI target "share" functionality not available in
SXCE. http://www.nexenta.com/nexentastor-relnotes
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 07:
James,
also there is this demo:
http://www.nexenta.com/demos/auto-cdp.html
showing how AVS/ZFS integrated in NexentaStor.
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:25 -0600, James D. Rogers wrote:
> The links to the Part 1 and Part 2 demos on this page
> (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/avs/Demos/) appear
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:53 -0400, Cherry Shu wrote:
> Are any plans for an API that would allow ZFS commands including
> snapshot/rollback integrated with customer's application?
Sounds like you are looking for abstraction layering on top of
integrated solution such as NexentaStor. Take a look o
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 20:53 -0600, James Dickens wrote:
>
>
> On 3/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What issues, if any, are likely to surface with using Solaris
> inside vmware as a guest os, if I choose to use ZFS?
>
> works great in vmware server, IO rate
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 16:22 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Robert Milkowski wrote:
> > Hello devid,
> >
> > Tuesday, March 20, 2007, 3:58:27 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > d> Does ZFS have a Data Management API to monitor events on files and
> > d> to store arbitrary attribute information with a file? A
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 09:29 -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 16:22 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> > Robert Milkowski wrote:
> > > Hello devid,
> > >
> > > Tuesday, March 20, 2007, 3:58:27 PM, you wrote:
> > >
> > > d>
Did you measure CPU utilization by any chance during the tests?
Its T2000 and CPU cores are quite slow on this box hence might be a
bottleneck.
just a guess.
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:10 -0400, Tony Galway wrote:
> I had previously undertaken a benchmark that pits “out of box”
> performance of UFS
Announcing new direction of Open Source NexentaOS development:
NexentaCP (Nexenta Core Platform).
NexentaCP is Dapper/LTS-based core Operating System Platform distributed
as a single-CD ISO, integrates Installer/ON/NWS/Debian and provides
basis for Network-type installations via main or third-part
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 16:26 -0400, Francois Saint-Jacques wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:51:08PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > More details on NexentaCP will be available soon...
>
> Is it based on Alpha7?
Alpha7 is the Desktop-oriented ISO, however they share the same main
New unstable ISO of NexentaCP (Core Platform) available.
http://www.gnusolaris.org/unstable-iso/ncp_beta1-test2-b67_i386.iso
Changes:
* ON B67 based
* ZFS/Boot manual partitioning support implemented (in addition to
auto-partitioning). Both, Wizard and FDisk types fully supported.
* gcc/g++ now
ptic package manager is really impressive
> is there a way to transform Sun package to a synaptic package?
>
> selim
>
> On 6/22/07, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Erast Benson wrote:
> >
> > > New unstable ISO of NexentaCP
Hi All,
This is the road to NCP 1.0...
Our motto:
"""Ubuntu makes best Debian Desktop platform - Nexenta makes best Debian
Server/Storage platform."""
Some latest Nexenta related news:
1) Official Nexenta Core Platform (NCP) repository now is
http://apt.nexenta.org
2) Unstable APT integrated
Thank you!
we are working on it. new website is coming, as well as next release of
NCP. Meanwhile, old RC1 could be downloaded from:
http://archive.nexenta.org/releases
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 18:01 -0800, MC wrote:
> > 2) Unstable APT integrated with ON build 79, give it a try!
>
> Excellent pro
Hi guys,
new article available explaining details on how enterprise-like upgrades
integrated with Nexenta Core Platform starting from RC2 using ZFS
capabilities and Debian APT:
http://www.nexenta.org/os/TransactionalZFSUpgrades
What is NexentaCP?
NexentaCP is a minimal (core) foundation that ca
I believe issue been fixed in snv_72+, no?
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:41 -0800, Jeff Bonwick wrote:
> The Silicon Image 3114 controller is known to corrupt data.
> Google for "silicon image 3114 corruption" to get a flavor.
> I'd suggest getting your data onto different h/w, quickly.
>
> Jeff
>
>
well, we had some problems with si3124 driver, but with driver binary
posted in this forum the problem seems been fixed. Later we saw the same
fix went in into b72.
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 05:11 +0300, Jonathan Stewart wrote:
> Jeff Bonwick wrote:
> > The Silicon Image 3114 controller is known to co
Take a look on NexentaStor - its a complete 2nd tier solution:
http://www.nexenta.com/products
and AVS is nicely integrated via management RPC interface which is
connecting multiple NexentaStor nodes together and greatly simplifies
AVS usage with ZFS... See demo here:
http://www.nexenta.com/demo
http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/entry/x4500_solaris_zfs_iscsi_perfect
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:44 -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> It would be useful if people here who have used iSCSI on top of ZFS
> could share their performance experiences. It is very easy to waste a
> lot of time trying to r
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 10:30 -0800, Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote:
> > > Yuen L. Lee wrote:
> > opensolaris could be a nice NAS filer. I posted
> > my question on "How to build a NAS box" asking for
> > instructions on how to build a Solaris NAS box.
> > It looks like everyone is busy. I haven't got any
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 09:46 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Lori Alt wrote:
> > Latest plan is to release zfs boot with U5. It definitely isn't going
> > to make U4.
> > We have new prototype bits, but they haven't been putback yet. There are
> > a number of design decisions that have hinged on
31 matches
Mail list logo
