Quick update;
George has been very helpful, and there is progress with my zpool. I've got
partial read ability at this point, and some data is being copied off.
It was _way_ beyond my skillset to do anything.
Once we have things resolved to a better level, I'll post more details (with a
lot of
ls
goes down.
Many thanks to George and his continued efforts.
From: haak...@gmail.com [mailto:haak...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mark Alkema
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 4:38 PM
To: Chris Forgeron
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Repairing Faulted ZFS pool when zbd doesn't
recognize the pool
Are you running CIFS with any AD integration, or is it functioning in
work-group mode?
Do you have lockups only when you transfer a lot of data, or will it lock up
without any machine working on the CIFS share?
How long is "time to time"?
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@op
I'm curious where ZFS development is going.
I've been reading through the lists, and watching Oracle, Nexenta, Illumos, and
OpenIndiana for signs of life.
The feeling I get is that while there is plenty of userland work being done,
there is next to nothing on ZFS development outside of the Orac
Ah, that's all I really need to know. I expected it to be public, but I
completely understand the need to keep it private so it can move forward
properly. This should hopefully provide enough record for other ZFS
well-wishers who are searching for signs of post-Oracle development.
-Origin
I see your point, but you also have to understand that sometimes too many
helpers/opinions are a bad thing. There is a set "core" of ZFS developers who
make a lot of this move forward, and they are the key right now. The rest of us
will just muddy the waters with conflicting/divergent opinions
I've got a system with 24 Gig of RAM, and I'm running into some interesting
issues playing with the ARC, L2ARC, and the DDT. I'll post a separate thread
here shortly. I think even if you add more RAM, you'll run into what I'm
noticing (and posting about).
-Original Message-
From: zfs-d
Hello,
I'm on FreeBSD 9 with ZFS v28, and it's possible this combination is causing
my issue, but I thought I'd start here first and will cross-post to the FreeBSD
ZFS threads if the Solaris crowd thinks this is a FreeBSD problem.
The issue: From carefully watching my ARC/L2ARC size and acti
>On May 9, 2010 at 5:29PM, Richard Elling wrote:
>>On May 9, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Chris Forgeron wrote:
>>[..]
>> Q1 - Doesn't this behavior mean that the L2ARC can never get data objects if
>> the ARC doesn't hold them?
>
>Yes.
>
>> Is setting pr
>-Original Message-
>From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
>[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kraus
>
>Over the past few months I have seen mention of FreeBSD a couple time in
> regards to ZFS. My question is how stable (reliable) is ZFS on this platf
Original Message-
From: Frank Van Damme
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 6:25 AM
>Op 20-05-11 01:17, Chris Forgeron schreef:
>> I ended up switching back to FreeBSD after using Solaris for some time
>> because I was getting tired of weird pool corruptions and the like.
>
&g
11 matches
Mail list logo
