Hmm...that easy? ;)
Thanks for the tip, i will see if that works out.
Bruno
On 29-6-2010 2:29, Mike Devlin wrote:
> I havnt tried it yet, but supposedly this will backup/restore the
> comstar config:
>
> $ svccfg export -a stmf > comstar.bak.${DATE}
>
> If you ever need to restore the configur
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> Due to recent experiences, and discussion on this list, my colleague and
> I performed some tests:
>
> Using solaris 10, fully upgraded. (zpool 15 is latest, which does not
> have log device removal that was introduced in zpool 19) In any way
> possible, you lose an un
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 08:58 +0200, Bruno Sousa wrote:
> Hmm...that easy? ;)
>
> Thanks for the tip, i will see if that works out.
>
> Bruno
Be aware of the Important Note in
http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenSolarisInfo/Backing+Up+and+Restoring+a
+COMSTAR+Configuration regarding Backing Up and Re
>
> would be nice if i could pipe the zfs send stream to
> a split and then
> send of those splitted stream over the
> network to a remote system. it would help sending it
> over to remote
> system quicker. can your tool do that?
>
> something like this
>
>s | ->
Ouch...!
Thanks for the head's up, and is there any workaround for this?
Can i for instance :
1. Create the iscsi block on the primary server with command : zfs
create -p -s -V 10G vol0/iscsi/LUN_10GB
2. Use sbdadm to make the lun available with command : sbdadm
create-lu /dev/z
Another related question -
I have a second enclosure with blank disks which I would like to use to take a
copy of the existing zpool as a precaution before attempting any fixes. The
disks in this enclosure are larger than those that the one with a problem.
What would be the best way to do this
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Tristram Scott
wrote:
>>
>> would be nice if i could pipe the zfs send stream to
>> a split and then
>> send of those splitted stream over the
>> network to a remote system. it would help sending it
>> over to remote
>> system quicker. can your tool do that?
>>
>>
You may wish to look at this thread:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=128046&tstart=0 (last
post):
start quote from thread
Hi everybody,
after looking into the current on source code (b134) into
/usr/src/lib/libstmf/common/store.c, I don't think that this bug
does st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/28/2010 10:30 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
>> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Tristram Scott
>>
>> If you would like to try it out, download the package from:
>> http://www.qu
>
> if, for example, the network pipe is bigger then one
> unsplitted stream
> of zfs send | zfs recv then splitting it to multiple
> streams should
> optimize the network bandwidth, shouldn't it ?
>
Well, I guess so. But I wonder, what is the bottle neck here. If it is the
rate at which zfs
Okay, at this point, I would suspect the spare is having a problem
too or some other hardware problem.
Do you have another disk that you can try as a replacement to c6t1d0?
If so, you can try to detach the spare like this:
# zpool detach tank c7t1d0
Then, physically replace c6t1d0. You review t
> I'm not sure I didn't have dedup enabled. I might
> have.
> As it happens, the system rebooted and is now in
> single user mode.
> I'm trying another import. Most services are not
> running which should free ram.
>
> If it crashes again, I'll try the live CD while I see
> about more RAM.
Succ
Hi,
I have a zpool which is currently reporting that the ":<0x13>" file
is corrupt:
bleon...@opensolaris:~$ pfexec zpool status -xv external
pool: external
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
corruption. Applications may be affected.
a
Hi Brian,
You might try running a scrub on this pool.
Is this an external USB device?
Thanks,
Cindy
On 06/29/10 09:16, Brian Leonard wrote:
Hi,
I have a zpool which is currently reporting that the ":<0x13>" file
is corrupt:
bleon...@opensolaris:~$ pfexec zpool status -xv external
pool:
Victor,
The 'zpool import -f -F tank' failed at some point last night. The box was
completely hung this morning; no core dump, no ability to SSH into the box to
diagnose the problem. I had no choice but to reset, as I had no diagnostic
ability. I don't know if there would be anything in the log
Hi All,
I created a zvol with the following options on an X4500 with 16GB of ram:
zfs create -s -b 64K -V 250T tank/bkp
I then enabled dedup and compression and exported it to Windows Server 2008 as
iSCSI via COMSTAR. There it was formatted with a 64K cluster size which is the
NTFS default for
evik wrote:
Reading this list for a while made it clear that zfs send is not a
backup solution, it can be used for cloning the filesystem to a backup
array if you are consuming the stream with zfs receive so you get
notified immediately about errors. Even one bitflip will render the
stream unusa
I have a box of 6 new Sun J4200/J4400 SATA HDD Caddies (250GB SATA drives
removed) moutings I am selling on ebay. Do a search on ebay for the listing
title
"Sun Storage J4200/J4400 Array-SATA Hard Drive Caddy x 6"
or follow this link
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=11055319086
Hi
There was some messup with switching of drives and an unexpected reboot, so I
suddenly have a drive in my pool that is partly resilvered. zfs status shows
the pool is fine, but after a scrub, it shows the drive faulted. I've been told
on #opensolaris that making a new pool on the drive and t
Hi Brian,
Because the pool is still online and the metadata is redundant, maybe
these errors were caused by a brief hiccup from the USB device's
physical connection. You might try:
# zpool clear external c0t0d0p0
Then, run a scrub:
# zpool scrub external
If the above fails, then please identi
I reviewed the zpool clear syntax (looking at my own docs) and didn't
remember that a one-device pool probably doesn't need the device
specified. For pools with many devices, you might want to just clear
the errors on a particular device.
USB sticks for pools are problemmatic. It would be good
Have you tried creating tank/bkp without the -s option. I believe I read
somewhere that the -s option can lead to poor performance on larger
volumes (which doesn't make sense to me). Also are you using a zil/log
device?
Josh Simon
On 06/29/2010 09:33 AM, Effrem Norwood wrote:
Hi All,
I crea
On Jun 29, 2010, at 8:30 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Victor,
>
> The 'zpool import -f -F tank' failed at some point last night. The box was
> completely hung this morning; no core dump, no ability to SSH into the box to
> diagnose the problem. I had no choice but to reset, as I had no diagnostic
On Jun 29, 2010, at 1:30 AM, George wrote:
> I've attached the output of those commands. The machine is a v20z if that
> makes any difference.
Stack trace is similar to one bug that I do not recall right now, and it
indicates that there's likely a corruption in ZFS metadata.
I suggest you to
>
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 8:30 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
>
> > Victor,
> >
> > The 'zpool import -f -F tank' failed at some point
> last night. The box was completely hung this morning;
> no core dump, no ability to SSH into the box to
> diagnose the problem. I had no choice but to reset,
> as I had
> I suggest you to try running 'zdb -bcsv storage2' and
> show the result.
r...@crypt:/tmp# zdb -bcsv storage2
zdb: can't open storage2: No such device or address
then I tried
r...@crypt:/tmp# zdb -ebcsv storage2
zdb: can't open storage2: File exists
George
--
This message posted from opensola
26 matches
Mail list logo
