Re: [zfs-discuss] What about this status report

Harry Putnam writes: > Ethan writes: > >>> Assuming your drives support SMART, I'd install smartmontools and see if >> there are any SMART errors on the drive. While the absence of SMART errors > > [...] > >> I've had trouble getting smartmontools to work with some of my >> controllers/drives in

[zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

Hello all, Currently i'm evaluating a system with an Adaptec 52445 Raid HBA, and the driver supplied by Opensolaris doesn't support JBOD drives. I'm running snv_134 but when i try to do uninstall the SUNWacc driver i have the following error : pkgrm SUNWaac The following package is currently ins

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

Hi I had the same problem with 2405 Remove aac of 134 and istall driver from adaptec . Driver for sol10u4 But working 10 On Mar 29, 2010, at 4:25 PM, "Bruno Sousa" wrote: Hello all, Currently i'm evaluating a system with an Adaptec 52445 Raid HBA, and the driver supplied by Opensolaris doesn

[zfs-discuss] FYI: Ben Rockwood: Solaris no longer free

Just FYI, flame wars please >/dev/null http://www.cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=1120 Solaris No Longer Free 28 Mar '10 - 10:14 by benr Hot on the heals of Oracle's revamp of Solaris support, the licensing agreement for free downloads of Solaris 10 have changed. Infoworld broke the ne

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Bruno Sousa wrote: > Hello all, > > Currently i'm evaluating a system with an Adaptec 52445 Raid HBA, and > the driver supplied by Opensolaris doesn't support JBOD drives. > I'm running snv_134 but when i try to do uninstall the SUNWacc driver i > have the followin

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

pkg uninstall aac Creating Planpkg: Cannot remove 'pkg://opensolaris.org/driver/storage/a...@0.5.11 ,5.11-0.134:20100302T021758Z' due to the following packages that depend on it: pkg://opensolaris.org/storage/storage-ser...@0.1,5.11-0.134:20100302T050950Z pkg uninstall aac storage-server pkg: R

[zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver - Howto

Hi all, I recently had to install the Adaptec AAC driver in a Opensolaris system, and given the fact that i had to do a couple of steps, i might as well share them , and hopefully someone will benefit it. So here goes : 1 - The adaptec AAC driver is needed when we have drives configured as JBOD

Re: [zfs-discuss] What about this status report

Both are driver modules for storage adapters Properties can be reviewed in the documentation: ahci: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5177/ahci-7d?a=view mpt: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5177/mpt-7d?a=view ahci has a man entry on b133, as well. cheers, Tonmaus -- This message posted

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

On 03/29/2010 09:32 AM, Yariv Graf wrote: > Hi > I had the same problem with 2405 > Remove aac of 134 and istall driver from adaptec . Driver for sol10u4 > > On Mar 29, 2010, at 4:25 PM, "Bruno Sousa" > wrote: >> Currently i'm evaluating a system with an Adaptec 52445

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Bruno Sousa wrote: >  pkg uninstall aac > Creating Planpkg: Cannot remove > 'pkg://opensolaris.org/driver/storage/a...@0.5.11 > ,5.11-0.134:20100302T021758Z' due to the following packages that depend > on it: > > pkg://opensolaris.org/storage/storage-ser...@0.1,5.1

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool split problem?

On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Frank Middleton wrote: Started with c0t1d0s0 running b132 (root pool is called rpool) Attached c0t0d0s0 and waited for it to resilver Rebooted from c0t0d0s0 zpool split rpool spool Rebooted from c0t0d0s0, both rpool and spool were mounted Rebooted from c0t1d0s0, only rpool

Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot replace a replacing device

On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Victor Latushkin wrote: On Mar 29, 2010, at 1:57 AM, Jim wrote: Yes - but it does nothing. The drive remains FAULTED. Try to detach one of the failed devices: zpool detach tank 4407623704004485413 As Victor says, the detach should work. This is a known issue and I'

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

Exactly where in the menu.lst would I put the -r ? Thanks in advance. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] sharing a ssd between rpool and l2arc

Hi, as Richard Elling wrote earlier: "For more background, low-cost SSDs intended for the boot market are perfect candidates. Take a X-25V @ 40GB and use 15-20 GB for root and the rest for an L2ARC. For small form factor machines or machines with max capacity of 8GB of RAM (a typical home system)

Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot replace a replacing device

Thanks for the suggestion, but have tried detaching but it refuses reporting no valid replicas. Capture below. C3P0# zpool status pool: tank state: DEGRADED scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank DEGRADED

Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot replace a replacing device

Thanks for the suggestion, but have tried detaching but it refuses reporting no valid replicas. Capture below. C3P0# zpool status pool: tank state: DEGRADED scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 ad4 ONLINE 0 0 0 ad6 ONLINE 0 0 0 repla

Re: [zfs-discuss] What about this status report

Just to apologize This not only sounds lame but IS pretty lame. Somehow in reading the output of `zpool status POOL', I just blew right by the URL included there: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P Which has quite a decent discussion of what it means. _

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool "cannot replace a replacing device"

> "cm" == Courtney Malone writes: > "j" == Jim writes: j> Thanks for the suggestion, but have tried detaching but it j> refuses reporting no valid replicas. yeah this happened to someone else also, see list archives around 2008-12-03: cm> I have a 10 drive raidz, recentl

[zfs-discuss] zfs recreate questions

I have a quick ZFS question. With most hardware raid controllers all the data and the info is stored on the disk. Therefore, the integrity of the data can survive a controller failure or the deletion of the LUN as long as it is recreated with the same drives in the same location. Does this ki

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recreate questions

JD Trout wrote: > I have a quick ZFS question. With most hardware raid controllers all > the data and the info is stored on the disk. Therefore, the integrity > of the data can survive a controller failure or the deletion of the > LUN as long as it is recreated with the same drives in the same >

[zfs-discuss] zfs diff

A new ARC case: There is a long-standing RFE for zfs to be able to describe what has changed between the snapshots of a dataset. To provide this capability, we propose a new 'zfs diff' sub-command. When run with appropriate privilege the sub-command describes what file system level changes hav

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

One really good use for zfs diff would be: as a way to index zfs send backups by contents. Nico -- ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recreate questions

That is great to hear. What is the command to do this? I setup a test situation and I would like to give it a try. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recreate questions

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:49 PM, JD Trout wrote: > That is great to hear. What is the command to do this? I setup a test > situation and I would like to give it a try. > If you can plan the removal, simply 'zpool export' your pool, then 'zpool import' it on the new controller / host. If you d

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

zfs diff is incredibly cool. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

On 30-3-2010 0:39, Nicolas Williams wrote: > One really good use for zfs diff would be: as a way to index zfs send > backups by contents. > > Nico > Any prevision about the release target? snv_13x? Bruno smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[zfs-discuss] pool won't import

r...@cs6:~# zpool import pool: content3 id: 14184872052409584084 state: FAULTED status: The pool metadata is corrupted. action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. The pool may be active on another system, but can be imported using the '-f' flag. s

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote: > One really good use for zfs diff would be: as a way to index zfs send > backups by contents. Or to generate the list of files for incremental backups via NetBackup or similar. This is especially important for file systems will millions o

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recreate questions

Perfect. Thanks! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

On 03/29/10 16:44, Mike Gerdts wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote: One really good use for zfs diff would be: as a way to index zfs send backups by contents. Or to generate the list of files for incremental backups via NetBackup or similar. This is especially imp

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:38:47PM -0400, David Magda wrote: > A new ARC case: I read this earlier this morning. Welcome news indeed! I have some concerns about the output format, having worked with similar requirements in the past. In particular: as part of the monotone VCS when reporting works

Re: [zfs-discuss] pool won't import

On Mar 29, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Tom Bird wrote: > r...@cs6:~# zpool import > pool: content3 >id: 14184872052409584084 > state: FAULTED > status: The pool metadata is corrupted. > action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. >The pool may be active on another system

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:37:15PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote: > There will also need to be clear rules on output ordering, with > respect to renames, where multiple changes have happened to renamed > files. Separately, but relevant in particular to the above due to the potential for races: wh

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

On 3/29/10 8:02 PM, Daniel Carosone wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:37:15PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote: There will also need to be clear rules on output ordering, with respect to renames, where multiple changes have happened to renamed files. Separately, but relevant in particular to the

Re: [zfs-discuss] pool won't import

On 3/29/10 7:52 PM, Richard Elling wrote: On Mar 29, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Tom Bird wrote: r...@cs6:~# zpool import pool: content3 id: 14184872052409584084 state: FAULTED status: The pool metadata is corrupted. action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. Th

Re: [zfs-discuss] sharing a ssd between rpool and l2arc

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 01:10:22PM -0700, F. Wessels wrote: > The caiman installer allows you to control the size of the partition > on the boot disk but it doesn't allow you (at least I couldn't > figure out how) to control the size of the slices. So you end with > slice0 filling the entire partit

Re: [zfs-discuss] sharing a ssd between rpool and l2arc

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 03:13:45PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote: > You can: > - install to a partition that's the size you want rpool > - expand the partition to the full disk - expand the s2 slice to the full disk > - leave the s0 slice for rpool alone > - make another slice for l2arc in the

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

On 03/30/10 12:44 PM, Mike Gerdts wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote: One really good use for zfs diff would be: as a way to index zfs send backups by contents. Or to generate the list of files for incremental backups via NetBackup or similar. This is es

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

Thanks..it was what i had to do . Bruno On 29-3-2010 19:12, Cyril Plisko wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Bruno Sousa wrote: > >> pkg uninstall aac >> Creating Planpkg: Cannot remove >> 'pkg://opensolaris.org/driver/storage/a...@0.5.11 >> ,5.11-0.134:20100302T021758Z' due to the fol