Ian Collins wrote:
I have a case open for this problem on Solaris 10u7.
The case has been identified and I've just received an IDR,which I
will test next week. I've been told the issue is fixed in update 8,
but I'm not sure if there is an nv fix target.
I'll post back once I've abused a tes
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Marty Scholes wrote:
I really want to move back to 2009.06 and keep all of my files /
snapshots. Is there a way somehow to zfs send an older stream that
2009.06 will read so that I can import that into 2009.06?
Can I even create an older pool/dataset using 122? Ideall
On 09/15/09 02:07 PM, Mark J Musante wrote:
zfs create -o version=N pool/filesystem
is possible to implement into a future version of ZFS a "released" send
command, like:
# zfs send -r2 ...
to send a specific release (version 2 in the example) of the metadata?
--
Luca Morettoni | Ope
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:48:20PM +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
> Ian Collins wrote:
> >I have a case open for this problem on Solaris 10u7.
> >
> >The case has been identified and I've just received an IDR,which I
> >will test next week. I've been told the issue is fixed in update 8,
> >but I'm no
> The zfs send stream is dependent on the version of
> the filesystem, so the
> only way to create an older stream is to create a
> back-versioned
> filesystem:
>
> zfs create -o version=N pool/filesystem
> You can see what versions your system supports by
> using the zfs upgrade
> comman
> The case has been identified and I've just received
> an IDR,which I will
> test next week. I've been told the issue is fixed in
> update 8, but I'm
> not sure if there is an nv fix target.
>
Anyone know if there Is an opensolaris fix for this issue and when?
These seem to be related.
htt
Hi,
I think I've run into the same issue on OpenSolaris 2009.06.
Does anybody know when this issue will be solved in OpenSolaris?
What's the BugID?
Thanks,
Constantin
Gary Mills wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:48:20PM +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
I have a case open for
EON ZFS NAS 0.59.3 based on snv_122 released!
Embedded Operating system/Networking (EON), RAM based live ZFS NAS appliance is
released on Genunix! Much thanks to Al at Genunix.org for download hosting and
serving the opensolaris community.
It is available in a CIFS and Samba flavor
EON 64-bit x8
On 09/15/09 06:27, Luca Morettoni wrote:
On 09/15/09 02:07 PM, Mark J Musante wrote:
zfs create -o version=N pool/filesystem
is possible to implement into a future version of ZFS a "released"
send command, like:
# zfs send -r2 ...
to send a specific release (version 2 in the example)
Hi, I'm setting up a ZFS environment running on a Sun x4440 + J4400 arrays
(similar to 7410 environment) and I was trying to figure out the best way to
map a disk drive physical location (tray and slot) to the Solaris device
c#t#d#. Do I need to install the CAM software to do this, or is there
http://www.dailytech.com/Startup+Drops+Bombshell+Lightning+SSD+With+180k+IOPS+500320+MBs+ReadWrites/article16249.htm
Pliant Technologies
just released two "Lightning" high performance enterprise SSDs that threaten to blow
away the competition. The drives uses proprietary ASICs to deliver an inc
http://www.plianttechnology.com/lightning_ls.php
Write Endurance Unlimited
:)
--
Roman Naumenko
ro...@frontline.ca
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
Gary Mills wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:48:20PM +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
I have a case open for this problem on Solaris 10u7.
The case has been identified and I've just received an IDR,which I
will test next week. I've been told the issue is fixed in update 8
On Sep 10, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Rich Morris wrote:
On 07/28/09 17:13, Rich Morris wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Sun has opened internal CR 6859997. It is now in Dispatched state
at High priority.
CR 6859997 has recently been fixed in Nevada. This fix will al
Quoting Roman Naumenko :
http://www.plianttechnology.com/lightning_ls.php
Write Endurance Unlimited
:)
Does anyone know list prices?
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and a
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:35:02PM -0400, en...@businessgrade.com wrote:
>
> >http://www.plianttechnology.com/lightning_ls.php
>
> Does anyone know list prices?
If you need to ask you can't afford it? :-D
-brian
--
"Coding in C is like sending a 3 year old to do groceries. You gotta
tell them
On Sep 15, 2009, at 6:58 AM, Marty Scholes wrote:
The zfs send stream is dependent on the version of
the filesystem, so the
only way to create an older stream is to create a
back-versioned
filesystem:
zfs create -o version=N pool/filesystem
You can see what versions your system supports
On Sep 15, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Dale Ghent wrote:
On Sep 10, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Rich Morris wrote:
On 07/28/09 17:13, Rich Morris wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Sun has opened internal CR 6859997. It is now in Dispatched
state at High priority.
CR 6859997 ha
On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:21 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Dale Ghent wrote:
On Sep 10, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Rich Morris wrote:
On 07/28/09 17:13, Rich Morris wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Sun has opened internal CR 6859997. It is now in
Reference below...
On Sep 15, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Dale Ghent wrote:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:21 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Dale Ghent wrote:
On Sep 10, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Rich Morris wrote:
On 07/28/09 17:13, Rich Morris wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Bob
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Dale Ghent wrote:
Question though... why is bug fix that can be a watershed for
performance be held back for so long? s10u9 won't be available for
at least 6 months from now, and with a huge environment, I try hard
not to live off of IDRs.
As someone who currently faces
Hi,
I'm trying to identify why my nfs server does not work. I'm using a more
or less core install of OSOL 2009.06 (release) and installed and
configured a nfs server.
The issue: nfs server won't start - it can't find any filesystems in
/etc/dfs/sharetab. the zfs file systems do have sharenfs
On Sep 15, 2009, at 6:28 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Dale Ghent wrote:
Question though... why is bug fix that can be a watershed for
performance be held back for so long? s10u9 won't be available for
at least 6 months from now, and with a huge environment, I try hard
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Tom de Waal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to identify why my nfs server does not work. I'm using a more or
> less core install of OSOL 2009.06 (release) and installed and configured a
> nfs server.
>
> The issue: nfs server won't start - it can't find any filesystems
Quoting Brian Hechinger :
If you need to ask you can't afford it? :-D
-brian
--
We can all dream can't we?
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use
Tom
What's in the NFS server log? (svcs -x)
BTW: Why are the NFS services disabled? If it has a problem I would
have expected it to be in state maintenance.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2252/smf-5?a=view
DISABLED
The instance is disabled. Enabling the service results in
Hi!
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
"yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Su
Neal Pollack Sun.COM> writes:
>
> Pliant Technologies just released two "Lightning" high performance
> enterprise SSDs that threaten to blow away the competition.
One can build an SSD-based storage device that gives you:
o 320GB of storage capacity (2.1x better than their 2.5" model: 150GB)
o 10
Roland Mainz wrote:
Hi!
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
"yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
tmpfs does not support ACLs
see _PC_ACL_ENABLED in [f]pathconf(2). You can query the file sy
Norm Jacobs wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
> > "yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
> > etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
>
> I have some vague recollection that tmpfs doesn't support ACLs snd it
>
Interesting question takes a
few minutes to test...
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2252/acl-5?l=en&a=view&q=acl%285%29+
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2239/chmod-1?l=en&a=view
ZFS
[tp47...@norton:] df .
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
rpool/export/h
Roland Mainz wrote:
Norm Jacobs wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
"yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
I have some vague recollection that tmpfs doesn't s
Ian Collins wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Norm Jacobs wrote:
> >> Roland Mainz wrote:
> >>> Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
> >>> "yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
> >>> etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
> >>>
> >> I have some
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Norm Jacobs wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
"yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Dale Ghent wrote:
As someone who currently faces kernel panics with recent U7+ kernel patches
(on AMD64 and SPARC) related to PCI bus upset, I expect that Sun will take
the time to make sure that the implementation is as good as it can be and
is thoroughly tested before r
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Eric Schrock wrote:
> Actually, it's not one byte - the entire page is garbage (as we saw in
> the dtrace output). But I'm guessing that smartctl (and hardware SATL)
> is aborting on the first invalid record, while we keep going and blindly
> "translate" one form of garbage i
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually
test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any
other options ?
By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that:
# mkfile 64m /zpool.file
# zpool create test /zpool.file
On Sep 15, 2009, at 8:32 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
I updated to the new X25-E firmware, and I think it might have
resolved the
problem. smartctl under Linux no longer give a warning, and the
diskstat
check under Solaris no longer appears to have garbage. I attached
output
from smartctl, d
Robert Thurlow wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
>
> > Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually
> > test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any
> > other options ?
>
> By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that:
>
> # mkfile 64m
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Eric Schrock wrote:
> I don't have the ATA spec in front of me, but that that looks like pretty
> normal output to me. Glad to hear they addressed the issue.
Excellent; I reinstalled it in my test x4500, if no other issues show up I
can try to get my proposal to install them
Lori Alt wrote:
On 09/15/09 06:27, Luca Morettoni wrote:
On 09/15/09 02:07 PM, Mark J Musante wrote:
zfs create -o version=N pool/filesystem
is possible to implement into a future version of ZFS a "released"
send command, like:
# zfs send -r2 ...
to send a specific release (version 2
Erik Trimble wrote:
Lori Alt wrote:
On 09/15/09 06:27, Luca Morettoni wrote:
On 09/15/09 02:07 PM, Mark J Musante wrote:
zfs create -o version=N pool/filesystem
is possible to implement into a future version of ZFS a "released"
send command, like:
# zfs send -r2 ...
to send a specif
Roland Mainz wrote:
Robert Thurlow wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually
test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any
other options ?
By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that:
43 matches
Mail list logo
