At 3:40 PM -0700 6/1/09, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 03:30:11PM -0700, Maurice Volaski wrote:
>So we have a 24x1TB system (from Silicon Mechanics). It's using an LSI
>SAS card so we don't have any hardware RAID virtual drive type options.
>
>Solaris 10 05/09
>
>I was hop
Hi There,
We're running the latest OpenSolaris version with the build-in CIFS service.
We experienced the problem that some users were opening the same Excel document
at the same time. One was using MS Excel, the other one OpenOffice. This
happend by accident. At the end, both weren't able to s
Tobs wrote:
Hi There,
We're running the latest OpenSolaris version with the build-in CIFS service.
We experienced the problem that some users were opening the same Excel document
at the same time. One was using MS Excel, the other one OpenOffice. This
happend by accident. At the end, both wer
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91015
* Summary: data loss using concurently OOo3 and another editor in the
same network
Also searching for openoffice and locking yields quite a bit of insight.
..Remco
C. Bergström wrote:
Tobs wrote:
Hi There,
We're running the latest Op
Hm. That's odd. "zpool clear" should've cleared the list of errors.
Unless you were accessing files at the same time, so there were more
checksum errors being reported upon reads.
As for "zpool scrub", there's no benefit in your case. Since you are
reading from the zpool, and there's checksums b
This looks like the same issue as:
6829176 dd w/ large block size fails on a zvol's character device
(metadb usesthe character interface even if you specify the
block one).
- Eric
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing li
Hi Victor,
Here's the output of 'zdb -e -bcsvL tank' (similar to above but with -c).
Thanks,
Brad
Traversing all blocks to verify checksums ...
zdb_blkptr_cb: Got error 50 reading <0, 11, 0, 0> [L0 packed nvlist]
4000L/4000P DVA[0]=<0:2500014000:4000> DVA[1]=<0:4400014000:4000> fletcher4
unc
Brad Reese wrote:
Hi Victor,
Here's the output of 'zdb -e -bcsvL tank' (similar to above but with -c).
Thanks,
Brad
Traversing all blocks to verify checksums ...
zdb_blkptr_cb: Got error 50 reading <0, 11, 0, 0> [L0 packed nvlist] 4000L/4000P
DVA[0]=<0:2500014000:4000> DVA[1]=<0:4400014000