scrub completed after 1h9m with 0 errors on Tue Feb 17 12:09:31 2009
This is about twice as slow as the same srub on a solaris 10 box with a
mirrored zfs root pool. Has scrub become that much slower? And if so,
why?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS sxce s
Do you have more data on the 107 pool than on the sol10 pool?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:11 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> scrub completed after 1h9m with 0 errors on Tue Feb 17 12:09:31 2009
>
> This is about twice as slow as the same srub on a solaris 10 box with a
> mirrored zfs root pool. Has sc
Hi,
I've raised bug 6806344 for this problem. I have been able to test the
fix by patching
fmd using mdb, but if you wish to test it, there's an x86 binary in
/home/stephh/libtopo.so.1
Steve
Hi,
James Litchfield wrote:
known issue? I've seen this 5 times over the past few days. I think
On Tue, February 17, 2009 01:50, Marion Hakanson wrote:
> Note that the only available pool failure mode in the presence of a SAN
> I/O error for these OS's has been to panic/reboot, but so far when the
> systems have come back, data has been fine. We also do tape backups
> of these pools, of cou
Hi All,
I have been watching this thread for a while and thought it was time a
chipped my 2 cents
worth in. I have been an aggressive adopter of ZFS here across all of
our Solaris
systems and have found the benefits have far outweighed any small issues
that have
arisen.
Currently I have many sys
Hi All
Does anyone have any experience on running qmail on solaris 10 with ZFS only?
I would appreciate if you share your findings, suggestion and gotchas
Thanks
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Wh
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:41:13 -0500
Blake wrote:
> Do you have more data on the 107 pool than on the sol10 pool?
80G on the "fast" one and 85G on the slow one.
Furthermore, on the fast one the total amount is 100G more than on the
slow one. So, I don't get it ;-)
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG
On 17 February, 2009 - dick hoogendijk sent me these 0,6K bytes:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:41:13 -0500
> Blake wrote:
>
> > Do you have more data on the 107 pool than on the sol10 pool?
>
> 80G on the "fast" one and 85G on the slow one.
> Furthermore, on the fast one the total amount is 100G mor
>On 17 February, 2009 - dick hoogendijk sent me these 0,6K bytes:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:41:13 -0500
>> Blake wrote:
>>=20
>> > Do you have more data on the 107 pool than on the sol10 pool?
>>=20
>> 80G on the "fast" one and 85G on the slow one.
>> Furthermore, on the fast one the total amou
> "hj" == Henrik Johansson writes:
hj> I have been operating quite large deployments of SVM/UFS
hj> VxFS/VxVM for some years and while you sometimes are forced to
hj> do a filesystem check and some files might end up in
hj> lost+found I have never lost a whole filesystem.
I t
casper@sun.com wrote:
I currently have a system with 2x1TB WDC disks; it's now running 103 and I
hope to upgrade it to 108 or 109 shortly. Then we should be able to
measure between a build before and after 105.
It only uses around 200GB and it now takes around 1 hour to "scrub" it.
I ha
Hello Asif,
Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 7:43:41 PM, you wrote:
AI> Hi All
AI> Does anyone have any experience on running qmail on solaris 10 with ZFS
only?
AI> I would appreciate if you share your findings, suggestion and gotchas
It just works.
--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowski
I have an OpenSolaris snv_105 server at home that holds my photos,
docs, music, etc, in a zfs pool. I backup my laptops with rsync to the
OpenSolaris server. All of my important data is in one place, on the
OpenSolaris server. I want to backup this data. I want to protect
against losing my data, an
On Feb 17, 2009, at 17:56, Joe S wrote:
Does that sound like a viable backup solution?
It has been explicitly stated numerous times that the output of 'zfs
send' has no guarantees and it is undocumented. From zfs(1M):
The format of the [zfs send] stream is evolving. No backwards
compatib
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM, David Magda wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2009, at 17:56, Joe S wrote:
>
>> Does that sound like a viable backup solution?
>
> It has been explicitly stated numerous times that the output of 'zfs send'
> has no guarantees and it is undocumented. From zfs(1M):
>
>> The format
On 17-Feb-09, at 3:01 PM, Scott Lawson wrote:
Hi All,
...
I have seen other people discussing power availability on other
threads
recently. If you
want it, you can have it. You just need the business case for it. I
don't buy the comments
on UPS unreliability.
Hi,
I remarked on it. FWIW, m
Hi All,
I have been watching this thread for a while and thought it was time a
chipped my 2 cents
worth in. I have been an aggressive adopter of ZFS here across all of
our Solaris
systems and have found the benefits have far outweighed any small issues
that have
arisen.
Currently I have many
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello Asif,
>
> Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 7:43:41 PM, you wrote:
>
> AI> Hi All
>
> AI> Does anyone have any experience on running qmail on solaris 10 with ZFS
> only?
>
> AI> I would appreciate if you share your findings, suggestion an
Toby Thain wrote:
On 17-Feb-09, at 3:01 PM, Scott Lawson wrote:
Hi All,
...
I have seen other people discussing power availability on other threads
recently. If you
want it, you can have it. You just need the business case for it. I
don't buy the comments
on UPS unreliability.
Hi,
I remar
On 17-Feb-09, at 8:28 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Robert Milkowski
wrote:
Hello Asif,
Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 7:43:41 PM, you wrote:
AI> Hi All
AI> Does anyone have any experience on running qmail on solaris 10
with ZFS only?
AI> I would appreciate if yo
On Feb 17, 2009, at 21:35, Scott Lawson wrote:
Everything we have has dual power supplies, feed from dual power
rails, feed from separate switchboards, through separate very large
UPS's, backed by generators, feed by two substations and then cloned
to another data center 3 km away. HA
ht
On 17-Feb-09, at 9:35 PM, Scott Lawson wrote:
Toby Thain wrote:
On 17-Feb-09, at 3:01 PM, Scott Lawson wrote:
Hi All,
...
I have seen other people discussing power availability on other
threads
recently. If you
want it, you can have it. You just need the business case for it. I
don't b
David Magda wrote:
On Feb 17, 2009, at 21:35, Scott Lawson wrote:
Everything we have has dual power supplies, feed from dual power
rails, feed from separate switchboards, through separate very large
UPS's, backed by generators, feed by two substations and then cloned
to another data center
I've got a server that freezes when I run a zpool scrub from cron.
Zpool scrub runs fine from the command line, no errors.
The freeze happens within 30 seconds of the zpool scrub happening.
The one core dump I succeeded in taking showed an arccache eating up
all the ram.
The server's running Solari
Toby Thain wrote:
Not at all. You've convinced me. Your servers will never, ever lose
power unexpectedly.
Methinks living in Auckland has something to do with that :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_Auckland_power_crisis
When services are reliable, then complacency brings risk.
My favorit
On February 17, 2009 6:35:12 PM -0500 David Magda
wrote:
On Feb 17, 2009, at 17:56, Joe S wrote:
Does that sound like a viable backup solution?
It has been explicitly stated numerous times that the output of 'zfs
send' has no guarantees and it is undocumented. From zfs(1M):
The format of t
On February 17, 2009 3:57:34 PM -0800 Joe S wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM, David Magda wrote:
If you want to do back ups of your file system use a documented utility
(tar, cpio, pax, zip, etc.).
I'm going to try to use Amanda and backup my data (not snapshots).
You missed the poin
I'm hoping to get some general clues about what all is required to get
an experiment going with zfs.
I've managed to install osol-11 in a vmware on windowsXP host from a
recent *.iso.
I'm following along with Simon's blog showing how to set up ZFS. I'm
newbie with both ZFS and Solaris but the in
28 matches
Mail list logo
