>On 17 February, 2009 - dick hoogendijk sent me these 0,6K bytes: > >> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:41:13 -0500 >> Blake <blake.ir...@gmail.com> wrote: >>=20 >> > Do you have more data on the 107 pool than on the sol10 pool? >>=20 >> 80G on the "fast" one and 85G on the slow one. >> Furthermore, on the fast one the total amount is 100G more than on = >the >> slow one. So, I don't get it ;-) > >The number of files also matter, as ZFS goes through the filesystem f= >or >scrub/resilver.. > >A filesystem with 10x10G files scrubs faster than one with 10000000x1= >0k files..
I currently have a system with 2x1TB WDC disks; it's now running 103 and I hope to upgrade it to 108 or 109 shortly. Then we should be able to measure between a build before and after 105. It only uses around 200GB and it now takes around 1 hour to "scrub" it. Casper _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
