Lori Alt wrote:
>> Since it seems that we won't be swapping on ZVOLS I need to find out
>> more how we will be providing swap and dump space in a root pool.
>>
> The current plan is to provide what we're calling (for lack of a
> better term. I'm open to suggestions.) a "pseudo-zvol". It's
> p
Is there any way to fix this? I actually tried to destroy the pool and try to
create a new one, but it doesn't let me. Whenever I try, I get the following
error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/crash# zpool create -f pool c0d0s5
internal error: No such process
Abort (core dumped)
After that zpool list
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Kwang-Hyun Baek wrote:
> Is there any way to fix this? I actually tried to destroy the pool and
> try to create a new one, but it doesn't let me. Whenever I try, I get
> the following error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/crash# zpool create -f pool c0d0s5
> internal error: No s
> eric kustarz wrote:
> > On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
> >
> >
> >> You sir, are a gentleman and a scholar!
> Seriously, this is exactly
> > the information I was looking for, thank you very
> much!
> >>
> >> Would you happen to know if this has improved
> since build 6
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
>> eric kustarz wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
You sir, are a gentleman and a scholar!
>> Seriously, this is exactly
>>
>>> the information I was looking for, thank you very
>>>
>>
Hi ,
Can one increase (or decrease ) a ZFS file system like the Veritas one
(vxresize)?
What is the command line syntax please ?
..you can just make up an example ..
for example in veritas :
"/etc/vx/bin/vxresize -x -F vxfs -g DG1 volume_name new_total_size"
Will increase "volume_name"
Greetings,
Given zfs pools, how does one import these pools to another node in
the cluster.
Mike
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo
On 7/16/07, tayo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Can one increase (or decrease ) a ZFS file system like the Veritas one
> (vxresize)?
> What is the command line syntax please ?
> ..you can just make up an example ..
>
> for example in veritas :
> "/etc/vx/bin/vxresize -x -F vxfs -g DG1 vol
I'm going to be setting up about 6 virtual machines (Windows & Linux) in
either VMWare Server or Xen on a CentOS 5 box. I'd like to connect to a ZFS
iSCSI target to store the vm images and be able to use zfs snapshots for
backup. I have no experience with ZFS, so I have a couple of questions
befor
I had originally considered something similar, but... for ZFS snapshot
abilities, I am leaning more towards zfs-hosted NFS... Most of the other VMs
(FreeBSD, for example) can install onto NFS, it wouldn't actually be going
over the network, and it would allow file-level restore instead of
drive-le
Mike Salehi wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Given zfs pools, how does one import these pools to another node in
> the cluster.
zpool export
zpool import
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.or
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> I'm going to be setting up about 6 virtual machines (Windows & Linux) in
> either VMWare Server or Xen on a CentOS 5 box. I'd like to connect to a
> ZFS iSCSI target to store the vm images and be able to use zfs snapshots
> for backup. I have no experience with ZFS, so
Sorry, my question is not clear enough. These pools contain a zone each.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Cyril Plisko wrote:
> On 7/16/07, tayo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> Can one increase (or decrease ) a ZFS file system like the Veritas one
>> (vxresize)?
>> What is the command line syntax please ?
>> ..you can just make up an example ..
>>
>> for example in veritas :
>> "/etc/v
Hello Magesh,
Monday, July 2, 2007, 4:12:11 PM, you wrote:
MR> We are looking at the alternatives to VXVM/VXFS. One of the
MR> feature which we liked in Veritas, apart from the obvious ones is
MR> the ability to call the disks by name and group them in to a disk group.
MR> Especially in SAN base
Carisdad wrote:
> Peter Tribble wrote:
>
>> # powermt display dev=all
>> Pseudo name=emcpower0a
>> CLARiiON ID=APM00043600837 []
>> Logical device ID=600601600C4912003AB4B247BA2BDA11 [LUN 46]
>> state=alive; policy=CLAROpt; priority=0; queued-IOs=0
>> Owner: default=SP B, current=SP B
>>
> > If it helps at all. We're having a similar problem. Any LUN's
> > configured with their default owner to be SP B, don't get along with
> > ZFS. We're running on a T2000, With Emulex cards and the ssd driver.
> > MPXIO seems to work well for most cases, but the SAN guys are not
> > comf
Darren Dunham wrote:
>>> If it helps at all. We're having a similar problem. Any LUN's
>>> configured with their default owner to be SP B, don't get along with
>>> ZFS. We're running on a T2000, With Emulex cards and the ssd driver.
>>> MPXIO seems to work well for most cases, but the SAN g
I'm brand new to zfs.
I have a system with a T3 array that I want to configure with zfs.
The T3 array had been setup with the Sun Volume manager in one big 250
Gb volume.
I want to remove this volume and setup zfs.
My problem is the system has had a new OS installed (Sol10u3) since the
volume
Does anyone have an update on this bugfix?
I'm trying to use some 3124 cards in production, and its painful!
Thanks,
Murray
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
My meta* commands all return:
"... there are no existing databases"
This is the T3 array:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: format
Searching for disks...done
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
.
2. c1t1d0
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],70/SUNW,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMA
> My meta* commands all return:
> "... there are no existing databases"
Then you're not using SVM volumes.
> This is the T3 array:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: format
> Searching for disks...done
> AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
> .
>2. c1t1d0
> /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTE
Thanks Darren,
re: "You can use ZFS on that volume, but it will have no redundancy
at the ZFS level, only at the disk level controlled by the T3."
I believe it is an older T3.
I'm using this system in a test lab, so data integrity is not too important for me. I mainly want to see what
> I'm using this system in a test lab, so data integrity is not too
> important for me. I mainly want to see what kind of performance I can
> get out of the zfs/T3 setup.
> I do see a note on pg 31 of the zfs admin guide that recommends against this
> configuration. (but saying it is possible).
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 18:19 -0700, Russ Petruzzelli wrote:
> Or am I just getting myself into shark infested waters?
configurations that might be interesting to play with:
(emphasis here on "play"...)
1) use the T3's management CLI to reconfigure the T3 into two raid-0
volumes, and mirror them w
Russ Petruzzelli wrote:
>Thanks Darren,
>
> re: " You can use ZFS on that volume, but it will have no
> redundancy at the ZFS level, only at the disk level controlled by
> the T3."
>
> I believe it is an older T3.
Performance-wise, these are pretty wimpy. You should be able t
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 18:19 -0700, Russ Petruzzelli wrote:
>
>> Or am I just getting myself into shark infested waters?
>>
>
> configurations that might be interesting to play with:
> (emphasis here on "play"...)
>
> 1) use the T3's management CLI to reconfigure th
Running Solaris 10 Update 3 on an X4500 I have found that it is possible
to reproducibly block all writes to a ZFS pool by running "chgrp -R"
on any large filesystem in that pool. As can be seen below in the zpool
iostat output below, after about 10-sec of running the chgrp command all
writes to t
Stuart Anderson wrote:
> Running Solaris 10 Update 3 on an X4500 I have found that it is possible
> to reproducibly block all writes to a ZFS pool by running "chgrp -R"
> on any large filesystem in that pool. As can be seen below in the zpool
> iostat output below, after about 10-sec of running th
Darren Dunham wrote:
>> My meta* commands all return:
>> "... there are no existing databases"
> Then you're not using SVM volumes.
Correct. No metadb, no SVM.
>> This is the T3 array:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: format
>> Searching for disks...done
>> AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
>> .
>>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 02:49:08PM +1000, James C. McPherson wrote:
> Stuart Anderson wrote:
> >Running Solaris 10 Update 3 on an X4500 I have found that it is possible
> >to reproducibly block all writes to a ZFS pool by running "chgrp -R"
> >on any large filesystem in that pool. As can be seen b
Stuart Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 02:49:08PM +1000, James C. McPherson wrote:
>> Stuart Anderson wrote:
>>> Running Solaris 10 Update 3 on an X4500 I have found that it is possible
>>> to reproducibly block all writes to a ZFS pool by running "chgrp -R"
>>> on any large filesystem in
James C. McPherson wrote:
>
>
> The T3B with fw v3.x (I think) and the T4 (aka 6020 tray) allow
> more than two volumes, but you're still quite restricted in what
> you can do with them.
>
You are limited to two raid groups with slices on top of those raid
groups presented as LUNs. I'd just st
I found a very nice doc. that describes the steps to create a kernel dump:
"The Solaris Operating System on x86 Platforms - Crashdump Analysis
Operating System Internals"
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/documentation/files/book.pdf
-> 7.2.2.Forcing system crashdumps
Rayson
On 7/17/07, Ja
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17/07/2007 05:12:49 AM:
> I'm going to be setting up about 6 virtual machines (Windows &
> Linux) in either VMWare Server or Xen on a CentOS 5 box. I'd like to
> connect to a ZFS iSCSI target to store the vm images and be able to
> use zfs snapshots for backup. I have
35 matches
Mail list logo
