> Can anyone tell me why pool created with zpool are also zfs file systems
> (and mounted) which can be used for storing files? It would have been
> more transparent if pool would not allow the storage of files.
Grab a cup of coffee and get comfortable. Ready?
Oh, what a can of worms this was.
Hello zfs-discuss,
What would you rather propose for ZFS+ORACLE - zvols or just files
from the performance standpoint?
--
Best regards,
Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
when playing with ZFS to try and come up with some standards for using it in
our environment I also disliked having the pool directory mounted when my
intentions were not to us it, but subdivide the space with in it.
Simple fix:
zpool create data
zfs create data/share
zfs create data/oracle
zf
On Jul 15, 2006, at 04:31, Jeff Bonwick wrote:
Grab a cup of coffee and get comfortable. Ready?
Oh, what a can of worms this was.
Between weblogs and this mailing list, there seems to be a lot of
talk about the "whys" on the design of ZFS. Being around for the
public 'birth' of a new fil
I have lots to learn, so this question may be riddled with
misconceptions, but here goes:
My understanding is that ordinary RAID-1 is only really resilient to
the extent that you can tell which of the two disks has the bad data
(e.g. if one whole disk is smoked, it's easy). Is mirroring
I have seen the recommendation for the Marvell storage controller.
http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AoC-SAT2-MV8.cfm
I know that about a year ago some Sun folks were recommending a Nvidia chipset
but I assume that would have changed or been expanded over a year. How could
eric kustarz wrote:
martin wrote:
How could i monitor zfs ?
or the zpool activity ?
I want to know if anything wrong is going on.
If i could receive those warning by email, it would be great :)
For pool health:
# zpool status -x
all pools are healthy
#
To monitor activity, use 'zpool i
David Abrahams wrote:
I have lots to learn, so this question may be riddled with
misconceptions, but here goes:
My understanding is that ordinary RAID-1 is only really resilient to
the extent that you can tell which of the two disks has the bad data
(e.g. if one whole disk is smoked, it's
Kieran wrote:
I have seen the recommendation for the Marvell storage controller.
http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AoC-SAT2-MV8.cfm
This uses the Marvell 88SX6081, which is supported by the marvell88sx(7D0
driver in Solaris. This is the same SATA controller chip used in th
Hi Roch; thanks for the discussion yesterday. I said I would plot the
iostat data, here it is.
The strange thing is the seeming half duplex operation of ZFS. Here is
a 45 minute plot of
%zpool iostat 1
The x-axis is data gathered every second. Note that when the write
cycle seems to start at
10 matches
Mail list logo
