On 4/13/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I definitely prefer CDDL or BSD license - they just offer more freedom.
+1
The Linux community won't be happy unless they get anything and
everything opensourced. And not only opensourced, it has to be under
GPL. And not only under GPL, t
And then you complain you can't get zfs or nvidia or wifi or ...
drivers, because you want that drivers and you want to force those
companies to give them for you under GPLv2. Some companies try to go
around that problem and there's still no consensus if it's legal or
not - but everyone is happy e
Hello Toby,
Friday, April 13, 2007, 3:06:44 PM, you wrote:
TT> On 13-Apr-07, at 9:51 AM, Al Hopper wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 12-Apr-07, at 11:51 PM, Rich Teer wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
> Those who promulgate the tag for w
Hello Rich,
Friday, April 13, 2007, 4:39:03 PM, you wrote:
RT> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
>> IMHO, this is a faulty conclusion.
RT> And I disagree. So we'll have to agree to disagree.
>> The interesting use case of "contributing", and I think the one that spurred
>> the creation o
Hello Ignatich,
Thursday, April 12, 2007, 1:25:57 AM, you wrote:
I> Rich Teer writes:
>> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Rayson Ho wrote:
>>
>>> Why does everyone need to be compatible with Linux?? Why not Linux
>>> changes its license and be compatible with *BSD and Solaris??
>>
>> I agree with this sen
