Hello Torrey,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 5:07:02 AM, you wrote:
TM> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Hello Torrey,
>>
>> Friday, November 10, 2006, 11:31:31 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> TM> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>>
>> Also scrub can consume all CPU power on smaller and older machines and
>> that's
Hello Torrey,
Friday, November 10, 2006, 11:31:31 PM, you wrote:
TM> Robert Milkowski wrote:
Also scrub can consume all CPU power on smaller and older machines and
that's not always what I would like.
REP> The big question, though, is "10% of what?" User CPU? iops?
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> Tuesday, November 7, 2006, 5:19:07 PM, you wrote:
>
> REP> Robert Milkowski wrote:
> >> Saturday, November 4, 2006, 12:46:05 AM, you wrote:
> >> REP> Incidentally, since ZFS schedules the resync iops itself, then it can
> >> REP> rea
Hello Richard,
Tuesday, November 7, 2006, 5:19:07 PM, you wrote:
REP> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Saturday, November 4, 2006, 12:46:05 AM, you wrote:
>> REP> Incidentally, since ZFS schedules the resync iops itself, then it can
>> REP> really move along on a mostly idle system. You should be able
Hello Richard,
Saturday, November 4, 2006, 12:46:05 AM, you wrote:
REP> Incidentally, since ZFS schedules the resync iops itself, then it can
REP> really move along on a mostly idle system. You should be able to resync
REP> at near the media speed for an idle system. By contrast, a hardware
RE
