OK, the Pool is died and i had create a new one :-)
regards ré
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
so, i forgot the rest of information:
ZFS v3
Zpool v15
Hard-Raid5 with CPQary3
the Pool was create in an early release and update to v15 with FreeBSD 8.1
AMD64, the FreeBSD Forum give me the tip to install OpenSolaris svn_134. Now
its running ;-)
regards ré
--
This message posted from opensol
hello,
I cannot help for your problem but one of my drives wwas also destroyed by last
week-end's storm. and what a storm it was!
good luck with your restore.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensol
I recently tried to import a b97 pool into a b98 upgraded version of that os,
and it failed because of some bug. So maybe try eliminating that kind of
problem by making sure to use the version that you know worked in the past.
Maybe you already did this.
>
> Folks,I have a zpool with a
> rai
Eric Schrock пишет:
> These are the symptoms of a shrinking device in a RAID-Z pool. You can
> try to run the attached script during the import to see if this the
> case. There's a bug filed on this, but I don't have it handy.
it's
6753869 labeling/shrinking a disk in raid-z vdev makes pool un-
These are the symptoms of a shrinking device in a RAID-Z pool. You can
try to run the attached script during the import to see if this the
case. There's a bug filed on this, but I don't have it handy.
- Eric
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 05:18:25PM -0700, Terry Heatlie wrote:
> Folks,
> I have a zpoo
Hi Terry
Please could you post back to this forum the output from
# zdb -l /dev/rdsk/...
... for each of the 5 drives in your raidz2.
(maybe best as an attachment)
Are you seeing labels with the error 'failed to unpack'?
What is the reported 'status' of your zpool?
(You have not provided a 'zpo
Terry Heatlie wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have a zpool with a raidz2 configuration which I've been switching
> between two machines - an old one with a hardware problem and a new
> one, which doesn't have hardware issues, but has a different
> configuration . I've been trying to import the pool on t
On Sep 16, 2008, at 5:39 PM, Miles Nordin wrote:
>> "jd" == Jim Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>jd> If at the time the SNDR replica is deleted the set was
>jd> actively replicating, along with ZFS actively writing to the
>jd> ZFS storage pool, I/O consistency will be lost, l
> "jd" == Jim Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jd> If at the time the SNDR replica is deleted the set was
jd> actively replicating, along with ZFS actively writing to the
jd> ZFS storage pool, I/O consistency will be lost, leaving ZFS
jd> storage pool in an indeterministic st
Corey
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 4:34 PM
>> To: Leopold, Corey
>> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZPOOL Import Problem
&
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 4:34 PM
> To: Leopold, Corey
> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZPOOL Import Problem
>
> Corey,
>
&g
Corey,
> I ran into an odd problem importing a zpool while testing avs. I was
> trying to simulate a drive failure, break SNDR replication, and then
> import the pool on the secondary. To simulate the drive failure is
> just
> offlined one of the disks in the RAIDZ set.
>
Are all constituent
13 matches
Mail list logo
