Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS Scalability/performance

2007-06-25 Thread Peter Schuller
> FreeBSD plays it safe too. It's just that UFS, and other file systems on > FreeBSD, understand write caches and flush at appropriate times. Do you have something to cite w.r.t. UFS here? Because as far as I know, that is not correct. FreeBSD shipped with write caching turned off by default for

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS Scalability/performance

2007-06-24 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:21:14PM -0700, Anton B. Rang wrote: > > Oliver Schinagl wrote: > > > zo basically, what you are saying is that on FBSD there's no performane > > > issue, whereas on solaris there (can be if write caches aren't enabled) > > > > Solaris plays it safe by default. You can,

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS Scalability/performance

2007-06-20 Thread Toby Thain
On 20-Jun-07, at 12:23 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: Hello, I'm quite interested in ZFS, like everybody else I suppose, and am about to install FBSD with ZFS. On that note, i have a different first question to start with. I personally am a Linux fanboy, and would love to see/use ZFS on linux