Ralf Ramge schrieb:
> Thomas Liesner wrote:
>> Does this mean, that if i have a pool of 7TB with one filesystem for all
>> users
>> with a quota of 6TB i'd be alright?
> Yep. Although I *really* recommend creating individual file systems, e.g.
> if you have 1,000 users on your server, I'd create
Thomas Liesner wrote:
> Does this mean, that if i have a pool of 7TB with one filesystem for all
> users with a quota of 6TB i'd be alright?
>
Yep. Although I *really* recommend creating individual file systems,
e.g. if you have 1,000 users on your server, I'd create 1,000 file
systems with a
bda wrote:
> I haven't noticed this behavior when ZFS has (as recommended) the
> full disk.
Good to know, as i intended to use the whole disks anyway.
Thanks,
Tom
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@open
Ralf Ramge wrote:
> Quotas are applied to file systems, not pools, and a such are pretty
> independent from the pool size. I found it best to give every user
> his/her own filesystem and applying individual quotas afterwards.
Does this mean, that if i have a pool of 7TB with one filesystem for
Thomas Liesner wrote:
> Nobody out there who ever had problems with low diskspace?
>
>
Okay, I found your original mail :-)
Quotas are applied to file systems, not pools, and a such are pretty
independent from the pool size. I found it best to give every user
his/her own filesystem and applyi
+--
| On 2008-02-12 02:40:33, Thomas Liesner wrote:
|
| Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Avoiding performance decrease when pool usage is
| over 80%
|
| Nobody out there who ever had problems with low diskspace?
Only in
Nobody out there who ever had problems with low diskspace?
Regrads,
Tom
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
