Thomas Liesner wrote: > Does this mean, that if i have a pool of 7TB with one filesystem for all > users with a quota of 6TB i'd be alright? > Yep. Although I *really* recommend creating individual file systems, e.g. if you have 1,000 users on your server, I'd create 1,000 file systems with a quota of 6 GB each. Easier to handle, more flexible to use, easier to backup, it allows better use of snapshots and it's easier to migrate single users to other servers.
> The usage of that fs would never be over 80%, right? > > Nope. Don't mix up pools and file systems. your pool of 7TB will only be filled to a maximum of 6TB, but the file system will be 100% full. which shouldn't impact your overall performance. > Like in the following example for the pool "shares" with a poolsize of 228G > an one fs with a quota of 100G: > > shares 228G 28K 220G 1% /shares > shares/production 100G 8,4G 92G 9% /shares/production > > This would suite me perfectly, as this would be exactly what i wanted to do ;) > > Yep, you got it. -- Ralf Ramge Senior Solaris Administrator, SCNA, SCSA Tel. +49-721-91374-3963 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://web.de/ 1&1 Internet AG Brauerstraße 48 76135 Karlsruhe Amtsgericht Montabaur HRB 6484 Vorstand: Henning Ahlert, Ralph Dommermuth, Matthias Ehrlich, Andreas Gauger, Thomas Gottschlich, Matthias Greve, Robert Hoffmann, Markus Huhn, Norbert Lang, Achim Weiss Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Michael Scheeren _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
