Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] zpool import - cannot mount [...] directory is not empty

2006-08-16 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Eric, Wednesday, August 16, 2006, 4:48:46 PM, you wrote: ES> What does 'zfs list -o name,mountpoint' and 'zfs mount' show after the ES> import? My only guess is that you have some explicit mountpoint set ES> that's confusing the DSl-orderered mounting code. If this is the case, ES> this w

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool import - cannot mount [...] directory is not empty

2006-08-16 Thread Eric Schrock
What does 'zfs list -o name,mountpoint' and 'zfs mount' show after the import? My only guess is that you have some explicit mountpoint set that's confusing the DSl-orderered mounting code. If this is the case, this was fixed in build 46 (likely to be in S10u4) to always mount datasets in mountpoi

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] zpool import - cannot mount [...] directory is not empty

2006-08-16 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Mark, Wednesday, August 16, 2006, 3:23:43 PM, you wrote: MM> Robert, MM> Are you sure that nfs-s5-p0/d5110 and nfs-s5-p0/d5111 are mounted MM> following the import? These messages imply that the d5110 and d5111 MM> directories in the top-level filesystem of pool nfs-s5-p0 are not MM> empt

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool import - cannot mount [...] directory is not empty

2006-08-16 Thread Mark Maybee
Robert, Are you sure that nfs-s5-p0/d5110 and nfs-s5-p0/d5111 are mounted following the import? These messages imply that the d5110 and d5111 directories in the top-level filesystem of pool nfs-s5-p0 are not empty. Could you verify that 'df /nfs-s5-p0/d5110' displays nfs-s5-p0/d5110 as the "Fil

[zfs-discuss] zpool import - cannot mount [...] directory is not empty

2006-08-15 Thread Robert Milkowski
All pools were exported than I tried to import one-by-one and got this with only a first pool. bash-3.00# zpool export nfs-s5-p4 nfs-s5-s5 nfs-s5-s6 nfs-s5-s7 nfs-s5-s8 bash-3.00# zpool import nfs-s5-p4 cannot mount '/nfs-s5-p4/d5139': directory is not empty cannot mount '/nfs-s5-p4/d5141': direc