Matty wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2008 7:35 AM, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sengor wrote:
>>> On 1/17/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance, but is ZFS with compression safe to use in a
> production environment?
Yes, why wouldn't it be ? If it
On Jan 18, 2008 7:35 AM, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sengor wrote:
> > On 1/17/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Pardon my ignorance, but is ZFS with compression safe to use in a
> >>> production environment?
> >> Yes, why wouldn't it be ? If it wasn't safe it w
Sengor wrote:
> On 1/19/08, Fred Zlotnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> But, of course, many other enterprise customers _have_ adopted
>> ZFS, and are quite happy with it. For a list of ZFS reference
>> customers please contact Solaris Marketing. ZFS is used in many
>> mission critical roles
On 1/19/08, Fred Zlotnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, of course, many other enterprise customers _have_ adopted
> ZFS, and are quite happy with it. For a list of ZFS reference
> customers please contact Solaris Marketing. ZFS is used in many
> mission critical roles today, and by and large
On 1/19/08, Paul Kraus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect that the amount of changes / discussion is no less
> for ZFS than for any new filesystem, just that due to the open source
> nature of it the discussions are in public view. The fact that the
> issues *are* being discussed is a h
On 1/19/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On what do you base that statement ?
>
> How do you "see" what enterprises are adopting ?
>
> State your sources please.
Out of the many I work on only one's been keen on adopting it any time
soon, another one's planning to look into it but
On Jan 18, 2008, at 4:23 AM, Sengor wrote:
> On 1/17/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Pardon my ignorance, but is ZFS with compression safe to use in a
>>> production environment?
>>
>> Yes, why wouldn't it be ? If it wasn't safe it wouldn't have been
>> delivered.
>
> Few reas
Paul Kraus wrote:
> On 1/18/08, Sengor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Don't get me wrong, I believe ZFS is a great product to have come out
>> of Sun's software group, however I don't think it's matured enough to
>> be relied upon with mission crititcal systems. ZFS is changing too
>> fast to
Many enterprise customers have told us that they are waiting for
two features, not yet available in ZFS, before they will adopt
it widely in their datacenter environments:
- The ability to boot off of a ZFS partition. I don't actually
understand this one, since you can't boot Solaris from a Vx
Sengor wrote:
> On 1/18/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Simply FUD.
>
> I don't see many enterprises adopting ZFS even though it's been
> officially out for a while now.
On what do you base that statement ?
How do you "see" what enterprises are adopting ?
State your sources pl
On 1/18/08, Sengor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see many enterprises adopting ZFS even though it's been
> officially out for a while now. Looking over the mailing list and
> numbers of ZFS patches, it's enough to scare lots of people away.
I suspect that the amount of changes / di
On 1/18/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simply FUD.
I don't see many enterprises adopting ZFS even though it's been
officially out for a while now. Looking over the mailing list and
numbers of ZFS patches, it's enough to scare lots of people away.
Don't get me wrong, I believe ZF
Sengor wrote:
> On 1/17/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Pardon my ignorance, but is ZFS with compression safe to use in a
>>> production environment?
>> Yes, why wouldn't it be ? If it wasn't safe it wouldn't have been
>> delivered.
>
> Few reasons -
> http://prefetch.net/blog
On 1/17/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pardon my ignorance, but is ZFS with compression safe to use in a
> > production environment?
>
> Yes, why wouldn't it be ? If it wasn't safe it wouldn't have been
> delivered.
Few reasons -
http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/11/28/
> Pardon my ignorance, but is ZFS with compression safe to use in a
> production environment?
I'd say, as safe as ZFS in general. ZFS has been well-tested by Sun, but it's
not as mature as UFS, say. There is not yet a fsck equivalent for ZFS, so if a
bug results in damage to your ZFS data pool
Hello Agile,
Comments in-between
Thursday, January 17, 2008, 2:20:42 AM, you wrote:
AA> Hi - I'm new to ZFS but not to Solaris.
AA> Is there a search able interface to the zfs-discuss mail archives?
http://opensolaris.org/os/discussions/
and look for zfs-discuss list.
AA> We have a Windows
Agile Aspect wrote:
> Hi - I'm new to ZFS but not to Solaris.
>
> Is there a search able interface to the zfs-discuss mail archives?
Use google against the mailman archives:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/
> Pardon my ignorance, but is ZFS with compression safe to use in a
>
Hi - I'm new to ZFS but not to Solaris.
Is there a search able interface to the zfs-discuss mail archives?
We have a Windows 2003 Cluster with 200 TB SAN running under
Active Directory with file system compression.
Half the population is running Linux and the other half is running
Windows XP.
I
18 matches
Mail list logo
