> >> CFs designed for the professional photography
> market have better
> >> specifications than CFs designed for the consumer
> market.
> >>
> >
> > CF is pretty cheap, you can pick up 16GB-32GB from
> $80-$200 depending on
> > brand/quality. Assuming they do incorporate wear
> leveling, and
Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Richard Elling wrote:
The presumption is that you are using UFS for the CF, not ZFS.
UFS is not COW, so there is a potential endurance problem for
blocks which are known to be rewritten many times. ZFS will not
have this problem, so if you use ZFS r
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Richard Elling wrote:
> The presumption is that you are using UFS for the CF, not ZFS.
> UFS is not COW, so there is a potential endurance problem for
> blocks which are known to be rewritten many times. ZFS will not
> have this problem, so if you use ZFS root, you are better
Paul B. Henson wrote:
So I was looking into the boot flash feature of the newer x4540, and
evidently it is simply a CompactFlash slot, with all of the disadvantages
and limitations of that type of media. The sun deployment guide recommends
minimizing writes to a CF boot device, in particular by N
So I was looking into the boot flash feature of the newer x4540, and
evidently it is simply a CompactFlash slot, with all of the disadvantages
and limitations of that type of media. The sun deployment guide recommends
minimizing writes to a CF boot device, in particular by NFS mounting /var
from a
