Michael Barrett wrote:
Does ZFS handle a file system full situation any better than UFS? I had
a ZFS file system run at 100% full for a few days, deleted out the
offending files to bring it back down to 75% full, and now in certain
directories I cannot issue a ls -la (it hangs) but a ls works
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Michael Barrett wrote:
Normally if you have a ufs file system hit 100% and you have a very
high level of system and application load on the box (that resides in
the 100% file system) you will run into inode issues that require a
fsck and show themselves by not being about
dudekula mastan wrote:
Atleaset in my experience, I saw Corruptions when ZFS file system was
full. So far there is no way to check the file system consistency on ZFS
(to the best of my knowledge). ZFS people claiming that ZFS file system
is always consistent and there is no need for FSCK comman
dudekula mastan wrote:
Atleaset in my experience, I saw Corruptions when ZFS file system was
full. So far there is no way to check the file system consistency on ZFS
(to the best of my knowledge). ZFS people claiming that ZFS file system
is always consistent and there is no need for FSCK comman
Michael Barrett wrote:
Normally if you have a ufs file system hit 100% and you have a very high
level of system and application load on the box (that resides in the
100% file system) you will run into inode issues that require a fsck and
show themselves by not being about to long list out all
Atleaset in my experience, I saw Corruptions when ZFS file system was full. So
far there is no way to check the file system consistency on ZFS (to the best of
my knowledge). ZFS people claiming that ZFS file system is always consistent
and there is no need for FSCK command.
>>>I cannot is
Michael Barrett wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Michael,
Sunday, May 27, 2007, 5:13:39 AM, you wrote:
MB> Does ZFS handle a file system full situation any better than UFS?
I had
MB> a ZFS file system run at 100% full for a few days, deleted out the
MB> offending files to bring it back d
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Michael,
Sunday, May 27, 2007, 5:13:39 AM, you wrote:
MB> Does ZFS handle a file system full situation any better than UFS? I had
MB> a ZFS file system run at 100% full for a few days, deleted out the
MB> offending files to bring it back down to 75% full, and now
Hello Michael,
Sunday, May 27, 2007, 5:13:39 AM, you wrote:
MB> Does ZFS handle a file system full situation any better than UFS? I had
MB> a ZFS file system run at 100% full for a few days, deleted out the
MB> offending files to bring it back down to 75% full, and now in certain
MB> directorie
Does ZFS handle a file system full situation any better than UFS? I had
a ZFS file system run at 100% full for a few days, deleted out the
offending files to bring it back down to 75% full, and now in certain
directories I cannot issue a ls -la (it hangs) but a ls works fine.
Normally in UFS t
10 matches
Mail list logo
