dudekula mastan wrote:
Atleaset in my experience, I saw Corruptions when ZFS file system was
full. So far there is no way to check the file system consistency on ZFS
(to the best of my knowledge). ZFS people claiming that ZFS file system
is always consistent and there is no need for FSCK command.
>>>I cannot issue a ls -la (it hangs) but a ls works fine
Masthan: On a ZPOOL it is always good to reserve 20% of the pool space
for storing meta data . And not to use this 20% space for any other
purpose. In your case, flush the data and then sync the zpool, still if
you are seeing the problem reboot your machine. If it is really bad to
you reboot also wont work, in that case increase the ZPOOL space.
This is where I am currently. This is a zone whose zonepath is a zfs
file system. The zpool is an entire SCSI drive. The zone is the only
thing that uses this zfs file system. Unfortunately the zoneadm -z name
halt command is hanging. I think I'm going to have reboot the global zone.
-Masthan
*/Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
Michael Barrett wrote:
> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Hello Michael,
>>
>> Sunday, May 27, 2007, 5:13:39 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> MB> Does ZFS handle a file system full situation any better than
UFS?
>> I had
>> MB> a ZFS file system run at 100% full for a few days, deleted
out the
>> MB> offending files to bring it back down to 75% full, and now in
>> certain MB> directories I cannot issue a ls -la (it hangs) but a ls
>> works fine. MB> Normally in UFS this meant one would need to run a
>> fsck. What does one
>> MB> do for ZFS?
>>
>>
>> 1. I've never run at a bug tat after ufs was 100% you need to fsck -
>> perhaps there's another problem?
>
> Normally if you have a ufs file system hit 100% and you have a
very high
> level of system and application load on the box (that resides in the
> 100% file system) you will run into inode issues that require a
fsck and
> show themselves by not being about to long list out all their
attributes
> (ls -la). Not a bug, just what happens.
I've done extensive testing of this condition and have never found a
need
for fsck. Can you reproduce this? If so, then please file a bug!
-- richard
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48220/*http://tv.yahoo.com/> on Yahoo! TV.
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
