Yep Dan,
Thank you very much for the idea, and helping me with my implementation
issues. haha. I can see that raidz2 is not needed in this case.
My question now lies as to full system recovery. Say all hell brakes loose
and all is lost except tapes. If I use what you said and just add snapshots
to
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:01:36PM -0800, Gregory Durham wrote:
> Hello All,
> I read through the attached threads and found a solution by a poster and
> decided to try it.
That may have been mine - good to know it helped, or at least started to.
> The solution was to use 3 files (in my case I ma
Hello All,
I read through the attached threads and found a solution by a poster and
decided to try it. The solution was to use 3 files (in my case I made them
sparse), I then created a raidz2 pool across these 3 files and started a zfs
send | recv. The performance is horrible, it was 5.62mb/s. When
Well I guess I am glad I am not the only one. Thanks for the heads up!
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:39 PM, David Magda wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 18:28, Gregory Durham wrote:
>
> One option I have seen is zfs send zfs_s...@1 > /some_dir/some_file_name.
>> Then I can back this up to tape. This se
On Jan 25, 2010, at 18:28, Gregory Durham wrote:
One option I have seen is zfs send zfs_s...@1 > /some_dir/
some_file_name. Then I can back this up to tape. This seems easy as
I already have a created a script that does just this but I am
worried that this is not the best or most secure way
Hello all,
I have quite a bit of data transferring between two machines via snapshot
send and receive, this has been working flawlessly. I am now wanting to back
the data from the failover to tape.I was planning on using bacula as I have
a bit of experience with it. I am now trying to figure out th
