Re[4]: [zfs-discuss] Zfs best practice for 2U SATA iSCSI NAS

2007-02-20 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Nicholas, Tuesday, February 20, 2007, 12:55:05 AM, you wrote: > On 2/19/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  5. there's no simple answer to this question as it greatly depends on workload and data.     One thing you should keep in mind - Solaris *has* to boot in a 6

Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Zfs best practice for 2U SATA iSCSI NAS

2007-02-19 Thread Nicholas Lee
On 2/19/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 5. there's no simple answer to this question as it greatly depends on workload and data. One thing you should keep in mind - Solaris *has* to boot in a 64bit mode if you wan to use all that memory as a cache for zfs, so old x86 32bi

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs best practice for 2U SATA iSCSI NAS

2007-02-19 Thread Nicholas Lee
On 2/20/07, Jason J. W. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ah. We looked at them for some Windows DR. They do have a nice product. Just waiting for them to get iscsi and vlan support. Supposely sometime in the next couple months. Combined with zfs/iscsi it will make a very nice small data

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs best practice for 2U SATA iSCSI NAS

2007-02-19 Thread Jason J. W. Williams
Hi Nicholas, Actually Virtual Iron, they have a nice system at the moment with live migration of windows guest. Ah. We looked at them for some Windows DR. They do have a nice product. 3. Which leads to: coming from Debian, how easy is system updates? I remember with OpenBSD system updates u

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Zfs best practice for 2U SATA iSCSI NAS

2007-02-19 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Nicholas, Monday, February 19, 2007, 11:31:50 AM, you wrote: > 2. What is the recommended version of Opensolaris to use at the moment that has iscsi?  Is there a stable-like branch or is it better to stay on the N-1 update?   3. Which leads to: coming from Debian, how easy is sy

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs best practice for 2U SATA iSCSI NAS

2007-02-19 Thread Nicholas Lee
On 2/18/07, Jason J. W. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If by VI you are referring to VMware Infrastructure...you won't get any support from VMware if you're using the iSCSI target on Solaris as its not approved by them. Not that this is really a problem in my experience as VMware tech suppo

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs best practice for 2U SATA iSCSI NAS

2007-02-17 Thread Jason J. W. Williams
Hi Nicholas, ZFS itself is very stable and very effective as fast FS in our experience. If you browse the archives of the list you'll see that NFS performance is pretty acceptable, with some performance/RAM quirks around small files: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?threadID=19858 ht

[zfs-discuss] Zfs best practice for 2U SATA iSCSI NAS

2007-02-17 Thread Nicholas Lee
Is there a best practice guide for using zfs as a basic rackable small storage solution? I'm considering zfs with a 2U 12 disk Xeon based server system vs something like a second hand FAS250. Target enviroment is mixature of Xen or VI hosts via iSCSI and nfs/cifs. Being able to take snapshots o