Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs and b114 version

2009-05-19 Thread Jorgen Lundman
I tried LUpdate 3 times with same result, burnt the ISO and installed the old fashioned way, and it boots fine. Jorgen Lundman wrote: Most annoying. If "su.static" really had been static I would be able to figure out what goes wrong. When I boot into miniroot/failsafe it works just fine

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs and b114 version

2009-05-19 Thread Jorgen Lundman
Most annoying. If "su.static" really had been static I would be able to figure out what goes wrong. When I boot into miniroot/failsafe it works just fine, including if I set crle to use only libraries in /a/lib:/a/usr/lib (and 64 bit). So startd not launching must be some other file/permission

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs and b114 version

2009-05-18 Thread Jorgen Lundman
I used LUpdate to create a b114 BE on the spare X4540, and booted it, but alas, I get the following message on boot: SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_114 64-bit Copyright 1983-2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms. /kernel/drv/amd64/pcic: unde

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs and b114 version

2009-05-18 Thread James C. McPherson
On Mon, 18 May 2009 11:21:36 +0100 Sean Sprague wrote: > Hello Dick, > > > Sean Sprague wrote: > > > >> There appears to be a minor glitch in /etc/driver_aliases where a > >> spurious line for qlc has appeared in /etc/driver_aliases, but I have it > >> installed and running. > >> > > > >

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs and b114 version

2009-05-18 Thread Sean Sprague
Hello Dick, Sean Sprague wrote: There appears to be a minor glitch in /etc/driver_aliases where a spurious line for qlc has appeared in /etc/driver_aliases, but I have it installed and running. What's a spurious line (I'm dutch) and how did you "solve" it? Delete the (qlc) line?

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs and b114 version

2009-05-18 Thread dick hoogendijk
Sean Sprague wrote: > There appears to be a minor glitch in /etc/driver_aliases where a > spurious line for qlc has appeared in /etc/driver_aliases, but I have it > installed and running. What's a spurious line (I'm dutch) and how did you "solve" it? Delete the (qlc) line? -- Dick Hoogendijk --

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs and b114 version

2009-05-18 Thread Jorgen Lundman
The website has not been updated yet to reflect its availability (thus it may not be "official" yet), but you can get SXCE b114 now from https://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_SMI-Site/en_US/-/USD/viewproductdetail-start?productref=sol-express_b114-full-x86-sp-...@cds-cds_sm

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs and b114 version

2009-05-17 Thread Sean Sprague
The website has not been updated yet to reflect its availability (thus it may not be "official" yet), but you can get SXCE b114 now from https://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_SMI-Site/en_US/-/USD/viewproductdetail-start?productref=sol-express_b114-full-x86-sp-...@cds-cds_smi

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs and b114 version

2009-05-17 Thread C. Bergström
Jorgen Lundman wrote: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b114/ This URL makes me think that if I just sit down and figure out how to compile OpenSolaris, I can try b114 now^h^h^h eventually ? I am really eager to try out the new quota support.. has someone already tried compiling it perhap

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs and b114 version

2009-05-17 Thread Sean Sprague
Jorgen, http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b114/ This URL makes me think that if I just sit down and figure out how to compile OpenSolaris, I can try b114 now^h^h^h eventually ? I am really eager to try out the new quota support.. has someone already tried compiling it perhaps? How complic

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs and b114 version

2009-05-17 Thread James C. McPherson
On Mon, 18 May 2009 14:20:39 +0900 Jorgen Lundman wrote: > > http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b114/ > > This URL makes me think that if I just sit down and figure out how to > compile OpenSolaris, I can try b114 now^h^h^h eventually ? I am really > eager to try out the new quota support..

[zfs-discuss] Zfs and b114 version

2009-05-17 Thread Jorgen Lundman
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b114/ This URL makes me think that if I just sit down and figure out how to compile OpenSolaris, I can try b114 now^h^h^h eventually ? I am really eager to try out the new quota support.. has someone already tried compiling it perhaps? How complicated is c