On 7/28/06, Darren Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've had people mention that WAFL does indeed support clones of snapshots.
Is this a "what version of WAFL" problem?
apparently so, but it is rather new from the impression given from
this site:
http://www.tournament.org.il/run/index.php?/arc
I've had people mention that WAFL does indeed support clones of snapshots.
Is this a "what version of WAFL" problem?
Darren
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 7/27/06, Darren Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> one more time with the attachment
I wouldn't say that either system had "Raid-5". Both raid-4 and raid-z
have significant differences in how they work from raid-5.
Netapp certainly has quotas, but they're not as flexible as ZFS.
Can you e
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:17:47AM -0700, Praveen Mogili wrote:
> S10 and ZFS is opensource is great but If there is
> some solid material with technical detailsI would
> really appreciate it.
The ZFS on-disk file format is here:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/ondiskformatfinal.
> one more time with the attachment
I wouldn't say that either system had "Raid-5". Both raid-4 and raid-z
have significant differences in how they work from raid-5.
Netapp certainly has quotas, but they're not as flexible as ZFS.
Can you explain more what you mean by 'Raw device' and 'volume s
From a RAS perspective, ZFS's end-to-end data integrity feature is critical.
If the competing file system doesn't have this capability, then they can't play
in this sandbox.
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail
James,
This might be interesting to add to the file system
wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
I don't see WAFL there...
Bev.
James Dickens wrote:
one more time with the attachment
On 7/27/06, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/27/06, Pra
one more time with the attachment
On 7/27/06, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/27/06, Praveen Mogili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I m sure some of you may have heard this already
> ' ZFS is a reverse engineered WAFL'
> from NetApp guys. If not, you will soon...
>
> Has any
On 7/27/06, Praveen Mogili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I m sure some of you may have heard this already
' ZFS is a reverse engineered WAFL'
from NetApp guys. If not, you will soon...
Has anyone put together a white paper or a
presentation or some bullet points positioning ZFS vs
WAFL.
S10
Hi,
I m sure some of you may have heard this already
' ZFS is a reverse engineered WAFL'
from NetApp guys. If not, you will soon...
Has anyone put together a white paper or a
presentation or some bullet points positioning ZFS vs
WAFL.
S10 and ZFS is opensource is great but If there is
some sol
10 matches
Mail list logo
