Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS vs WAFL positioning

[Bev Crair]

James, This might be interesting to add to the file system wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems I don't see WAFL there... Bev. James Dickens wrote: one more time with the attachment On 7/27/06, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/27/06, Praveen Mogili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I m sure some of you may have heard this already > ' ZFS is a reverse engineered WAFL' > from NetApp guys. If not, you will soon... > > Has anyone put together a white paper or a > presentation or some bullet points positioning ZFS vs > WAFL. > > S10 and ZFS is opensource is great but If there is > some solid material with technical details....I would > really appreciate it. > Hi I have attached comparison I did of the two systems. Didn't go into much detail, but its pretty clear that ZFS has a lot more features and less limitations than AWFL. James Dickens uadmin.blogspot.com > Thanks for any pointers. > /Praveen > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss