Re: [zfs-discuss] Terabyte scrub

2008-09-05 Thread Marcelo Leal
You are right! Seeing the numbers i could not think very well ;-) What matters is the "used" size, and not the storage capacity! My fault... Thanks a lot for the answers. Leal. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing li

Re: [zfs-discuss] Terabyte scrub

2008-09-04 Thread Anton B. Rang
If you're using a mirror, and each disk manages 50 MB/second (unlikely if it's a single disk doing a lot of seeks, but you might do better using a hardware array for each half of the mirror), simple math says that scanning 1 TB would take roughly 20,000 seconds, or 5 hours. So your speed under S

Re: [zfs-discuss] Terabyte scrub

2008-09-04 Thread Will Murnane
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 14:18, Marcelo Leal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > I was used to use mirrors and solaris 10, in which the scrub process for > 500gb took about two hours... and with solaris express (snv_79a) tests, > terabytes in minutes. I did search for release changes in the

[zfs-discuss] Terabyte scrub

2008-09-04 Thread Marcelo Leal
Hello all, I was used to use mirrors and solaris 10, in which the scrub process for 500gb took about two hours... and with solaris express (snv_79a) tests, terabytes in minutes. I did search for release changes in the scrub process, and could not find anything about enhancements in this magnitu