The answer is that an SMI label is required in which the first slice
covers the whole disk. A detailed process is described at:
http://www.castro.aus.net/~maurice/opensolaris/zfsbootmirror.html
Please note that there still may be other issues ie bug 6680633 but at
least I can now add
Hi All,
actually the drives are identical and approximately 34GB in formatted
in size. The solution I eventually took was to reinstall the system
and select the 2 disks in the installer and the mirror is created.
Unfortunately, there were other complexities in the process. ZFS boot
d
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:12 PM, John-Paul Drawneek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These 18gb disks?
It looks like they're 36GB:
0. c0t0d0
^^^
1. c0t8d0
^^^ ^^^
It also looks like they are not identical drives.
-B
These 18gb disks?
There a bug which is fixed in b92 which could be causing this?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Maurice Castro wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have just installed b90 on an E250 with 2 identical SCSI disks and
> zfs root. But I keep getting the error
>
> cannot attach /dev/rdsk/c0t8d0 to c0t0d0s0: device is too small
>
> when I execute
>
> zpool attach rpool c0t0d0s0 /dev/rdsk/c0t8d0
Hi All,
I have just installed b90 on an E250 with 2 identical SCSI disks and
zfs root. But I keep getting the error
cannot attach /dev/rdsk/c0t8d0 to c0t0d0s0: device is too small
when I execute
zpool attach rpool c0t0d0s0 /dev/rdsk/c0t8d0
It appears to be a labelling
