Mario Goebbels wrote:
Also, it would seem that Apple really can't push ZFS into Mac OS X
until evacuation of data and removal of vdevs is supported for pools.
Does hfs+ support this? I see no evidence that it does.
HFS+ isn't a file system with integrated volume management. Any disks
where no
> > Also, it would seem that Apple really can't push ZFS into Mac OS X
> > until evacuation of data and removal of vdevs is supported for pools.
>
> Does hfs+ support this? I see no evidence that it does.
HFS+ isn't a file system with integrated volume management. Any disks
where no operating sy
George wrote:
I'm curious about something. Wouldn't ZFS `send` and `recv` be a
perfect fit for Apple Time Machine in Leopard if glued together by
some scripts? In this scenario you could have an external volume and
simply send snapshots to it and reciprocate as needed with recv.
Also, it would
I'm curious about something. Wouldn't ZFS `send` and `recv` be a
perfect fit for Apple Time Machine in Leopard if glued together by
some scripts? In this scenario you could have an external volume and
simply send snapshots to it and reciprocate as needed with recv.
Also, it would seem that Appl
On 13-Jun-07, at 4:09 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
On June 13, 2007 9:14:48 AM -0700 Rick Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
From
(http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;?
articleID=199903
525)
...
In a follow-up interview today, Croll explained, "ZFS is not the
default
file syste
So it's been what, a day (2?) and no one has tried to import a pool on
the Leopard beta?
-frank
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On June 13, 2007 9:14:48 AM -0700 Rick Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From
(http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;?articleID=199903
525)
...
In a follow-up interview today, Croll explained, "ZFS is not the default
file system for Leopard. We are exploring it as a file system op
So you can migrate all your ZFS volumes to HFS+ ;-)
>>> Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/13/2007 12:22 PM >>>
On 13-Jun-07, at 1:14 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
>> From (http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;?
>> articleID=199903525)
>
> ... Croll explained, "ZFS is not the default fi
Toby Thain, et al,
I am guessing here, but to just be able to access
the FS data locally without the headaches of
verifying FS consistency, write caches, etc.
Mitchell Erblich
Toby Thain wrote:
>
> On 13-Jun-07, at 1:14 PM, Rick Mann wrot
>From
>(http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;?articleID=199903525)
---
[...]
Seeking to clarify a statement made on Monday by Brian Croll, senior director
of Mac OS X Product Marketing, to two InformationWeek reporters that Apple's
new "Leopard" operating system would not inclu
On 13-Jun-07, at 1:14 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
From (http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;?
articleID=199903525)
... Croll explained, "ZFS is not the default file system for
Leopard. We are exploring it as a file system option for high-end
storage systems with really large st
>On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Rick Mann wrote:
>> ZFS Readonly implemntation is loaded!
>Is that a copy-n-paste error, or is that typo in the actual output?
It's a typo in the actual output.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing
12 matches
Mail list logo
