Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Compression with fixed record sizes

2006-08-22 Thread eric kustarz
Anton B. Rang wrote: If you issue aligned, full-record write requests, there is a definite advantage to continuing to set the record size. It allows ZFS to process the write without the read-modify-write cycle that would be required for the default 128K record size. (While compression results

[zfs-discuss] Re: Compression with fixed record sizes

2006-08-22 Thread Anton B. Rang
If you issue aligned, full-record write requests, there is a definite advantage to continuing to set the record size. It allows ZFS to process the write without the read-modify-write cycle that would be required for the default 128K record size. (While compression results in records of variable