On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 06:11 -0800, Marlanne DeLaSource wrote:
> What is even stranger is that if I copy a file in a raidz configuration
> (let's say /usr/bin/ls), we have different results out of regular commands :
>
> ls -l /usr/bin/ls /mapool/ls => same size
> ls -s /usr/bin/ls /mapool/ls => Di
What is even stranger is that if I copy a file in a raidz configuration (let's
say /usr/bin/ls), we have different results out of regular commands :
ls -l /usr/bin/ls /mapool/ls => same size
ls -s /usr/bin/ls /mapool/ls => Different sizes
du -s /usr/bin/ls /mapool/ls = > different sizes
Shouldn'
Podlipnik wrote:
When creating raidz pool out of n disks where n =>2 pool size will get a size
of the smallest disk multiplied by n:
# zpool create -f newpool raidz c1t12d0 c1t10d0 c1t13d0
# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
newpool
When creating raidz pool out of n disks where n =>2 pool size will get a size
of the smallest disk multiplied by n:
# zpool create -f newpool raidz c1t12d0 c1t10d0 c1t13d0
# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
newpool 139G141K1
