> > We are currently recommending separate (ZFS) file systems for redo logs.
> Did you try that? Or did you go straight to a separate UFS file system for
> redo logs?
>
> I'd answered this directly in email originally.
>
> The answer was that yes, I tested using zfs for logpools among a numbe
> We are currently recommending separate (ZFS) file systems for redo logs.
Did you try that? Or did you go straight to a separate UFS file system for
redo logs?
I'd answered this directly in email originally.
The answer was that yes, I tested using zfs for logpools among a number of
disk layo
JS wrote:
I'd definitely prefer owning a sort of SAN solution that would basically just
be trays of JBODs exported through redundant controllers, with enterprise level
service. The world is still playing catch up to integrate with all the
possibilities of zfs.
It was called the A5000, later
I'd definitely prefer owning a sort of SAN solution that would basically just
be trays of JBODs exported through redundant controllers, with enterprise level
service. The world is still playing catch up to integrate with all the
possibilities of zfs.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
