> We are currently recommending separate (ZFS) file systems for redo logs. Did you try that? Or did you go straight to a separate UFS file system for redo logs?
I'd answered this directly in email originally. The answer was that yes, I tested using zfs for logpools among a number of disk layouts and performance times were terrible on every one - no better than using a main zpool and carving off /log slices. Performance times went down (good) and disk %busy stayed low on all the ufs/directio setups. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
