Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re: ZFS improvements

2007-04-23 Thread Eric Schrock
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:49:35AM -0700, Ivan Wang wrote: > > Now this is scary, looking from the descriptions, it is possible that > we might lose data in zfs, and/or resulted in a corrupted zpool that > panics the kernel, if during the write operation, zfs loses connection > to underlying hardw

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: ZFS improvements

2007-04-23 Thread Ivan Wang
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:43:39PM -0700, Anton B. > Rang wrote: > > > > That's only one cause of panics. > > > > At least two of gino's panics appear due to > corrupted space maps, for > > instance. I think there may also still be a case > where a failure to > > read metadata during a transact

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: ZFS improvements

2007-04-23 Thread Gino
> > At least two of gino's panics appear due to > corrupted space maps, for > > instance. I think there may also still be a case > where a failure to > > read metadata during a transaction commit leads to > a panic, too. Maybe > > that one's been fixed, or maybe it will be handled > by the above bu

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: ZFS improvements

2007-04-11 Thread Gino
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:43:39PM -0700, Anton B. > Rang wrote: > > > > That's only one cause of panics. > > > > At least two of gino's panics appear due to > corrupted space maps, for > > instance. I think there may also still be a case > where a failure to > > read metadata during a transact