On 12/30/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>However, it gets interesting when SVID3 comes into play:
>
>
> The link(BA_OS) and unlink(BA_OS) descriptions in SVID3 both specify that
> a process with appropriate privileges is allowed to operate on a
>directory.
> We have claim
>However, it gets interesting when SVID3 comes into play:
>
>
> The link(BA_OS) and unlink(BA_OS) descriptions in SVID3 both specify that
> a process with appropriate privileges is allowed to operate on a
>directory.
> We have claimed to conform to SVID3 since Solaris 2.0 and have not
>a
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 02:28:49 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi.
Here are some things my file system test suite discovered on Solaris ZFS
and UFS.
Bascially ZFS pass all my tests (about 3000). I see one problem with UFS
and two differences:
1. link(2) manual page state
