On 12/30/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>However, it gets interesting when SVID3 comes into play: > ><snip> > The link(BA_OS) and unlink(BA_OS) descriptions in SVID3 both specify that > a process with appropriate privileges is allowed to operate on a >directory. > We have claimed to conform to SVID3 since Solaris 2.0 and have not >announced > that we ever plan to EOL SVID3 conformance. ><snip end> This seems to allow an escape route; we can declare that no process has sufficient privileges to link()/unlink() directories :-)
Ahhh... the good old standard excuse of Sun Microsystems to do nothing :) :) :) Holger _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
