ws SMB 2.0 bring huge
performance gain.
- Original Message -
From: "Joerg Schilling"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] OpenSolaris vs Linux
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Your data is surely out of date. Windows itself inse
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your data is surely out of date. Windows itself inserts "anti-virus"
> type checking into your application as it runs. Windows executes your
> application slower with each new service pack update and more and more
> run-time safety checks are added
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, russell aspinwall wrote:
> The tests were repeated just to make sure. Unfortunately until
> software is built and tested on Solaris 10, people tend to assume
> Windows is faster. The above tests were completed with no virus
> scanner installed as not to distort the results.
Hi,
A couple of years ago I compared Solaris 10 and XP x64 on the same hardware
(dual opteron) running the same analytical cases. Each OS had a clean install
before use :-
Case CPU time System Time Lapse Bits OS
No Secs Secs hh:mm:ss
1 5890
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Solaris does the same thing.
>
> (The X server will run the "foreground" processes with a higher priority)
Yes, it does, but I suspect not to the extreme degree as seen under
Windows. The performance difference between the "foreground"
and backgr
>Microsoft Windows is surely faster than any Unix because it executes
>the "foreground" task (the program with the highlighted title bar)
>with far more priority than any other task. Microsoft Windows XP Home
>Edition is fastest since it maximally cranks up the priority on the
>foreground tas
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> An OS that feels slower may actuall be much faster just because
> people have subjective impressions and because one OS may have been
> optiomized to result in best subjective impressions only.
Microsoft Windows is surely faster than any Unix because
"James C. McPherson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 22:28:36 -0500
> Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ian, Tim, again, thank you very much in answering my question.
> >
> > I am a bit disappointed that the whole discussion group does not have
> > one person to stand
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 22:28:36 -0500
Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian, Tim, again, thank you very much in answering my question.
>
> I am a bit disappointed that the whole discussion group does not have
> one person to stand up and say "yeah, OpenSolaris absolutely
> outperforms Linux a
: Joseph Zhou
Cc: Ian Collins ; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] OpenSolaris vs Linux
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
haha, Tim, yes, I see the Open spirit in this
in mind. Thank you!
zStorageAnalyst
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joseph Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss]
Joseph Zhou wrote:
> Thanks Ian, Tim,
> Ok, let me really hit one topic instead of trying to see in general
> what data are out there...
>
> Let's say OpenSolaris doing Samba vs. Linux doing Samba, in CIFS
> performance.
> (so I can link to the Win2008 CIFS numbers and NetApp CIFS numbers
> myself.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> haha, Tim, yes, I see the Open spirit in this reply! ;-)
>
> As I said, I am just exploring data.
>
> The Sun J4000 SPC1 and SPC2 benchmark results were nice, just lacking other
> published results with the iSCSI HBA as DAS
those results can be a basis for 7000
block-performance...
any comment?
Thanks!
z
- Original Message -
From: Tim
To: Joseph Zhou
Cc: Ian Collins ; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] OpenSolaris vs Linux
On
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Ok, thanks Tim, which SPC are you talking about?
>
> SPC-1 and SPC-2 don't test NAS, those are block perf.
> SPECsfs97 v2/v3 and sfs2008 have no OpenStorage results.
>
> If there are standard storage benchmarks out there, I w
s possible.
Thanks.
z
- Original Message -
From: Tim
To: Joseph Zhou
Cc: Ian Collins ; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] OpenSolaris vs Linux
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROT
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Thanks Ian, Tim,
> Ok, let me really hit one topic instead of trying to see in general what
> data are out there...
>
> Let's say OpenSolaris doing Samba vs. Linux doing Samba, in CIFS
> performance.
> (so I can link to the Wi
this specific point?
Thanks!
z
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joseph Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] OpenSolaris
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Thanks Tim,
> At this moment, I am looking into OpenStorage as NAS (file serving) vs.
> Linux NAS (Samba) vs. Win2008 NAS vs. NetApp (ONTAP, not GX) performance.
>
> I am also interested in block-based performance, but not as
Joseph Zhou wrote:
> Thanks Tim,
> At this moment, I am looking into OpenStorage as NAS (file serving)
> vs. Linux NAS (Samba) vs. Win2008 NAS vs. NetApp (ONTAP, not GX)
> performance.
>
There are still a number of ZFS/OpenSOlaris options to compare, iSCSI,
Samba, CIFS, NFS.
--
Ian.
__
] OpenSolaris vs Linux
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi list,
Any one has ANY new data on OpenSolaris vs Linux?
I only found an old post in 2006.
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2006-January/030366.html
And any co
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Any one has ANY new data on OpenSolaris vs Linux?
>
> I only found an old post in 2006.
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2006-January/030366.html
>
> And any comments on "if OpenSolaris perform
Hi list,
Any one has ANY new data on OpenSolaris vs Linux?
I only found an old post in 2006.
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2006-January/030366.html
And any comments on "if OpenSolaris performance is about the same as Solaris
10"?
Thanks!
z___
23 matches
Mail list logo
