Ok, thanks Tim, which SPC are you talking about?
SPC-1 and SPC-2 don't test NAS, those are block perf.
SPECsfs97 v2/v3 and sfs2008 have no OpenStorage results.
If there are standard storage benchmarks out there, I would not be here asking
folks.
To your point, how is the OpenSolaris native CIFS vs Linux Samba then? (if you
think this is more apple-to-apple than they both run Samba)
Again, I am here to explore data, not to argue, if I give you a dozen
configurations, could you get me the performance estimates and how the
estimates come from? I didn't think that route is possible.
Thanks.
z
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim
To: Joseph Zhou
Cc: Ian Collins ; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] OpenSolaris vs Linux
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Ian, Tim,
Ok, let me really hit one topic instead of trying to see in general what
data are out there...
Let's say OpenSolaris doing Samba vs. Linux doing Samba, in CIFS
performance.
(so I can link to the Win2008 CIFS numbers and NetApp CIFS numbers myself.)
Is there any data to this specific point?
Thanks!
z
So, you wouldn't use Samba on opensolaris, you'd use the native cifs stack.
Then we have to look at the system itself. How much ram? How many and what
kind of CPU's? How much disk on the backend? What kind of disk on the back
end?
I don't think you're going to find the numbers you're looking for to be quite
honest. And even if you did, I don't know how usable they'd really be. I'd
start by digging through the spc benchmarks.
--Tim
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
